Connect with Healthcetera
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 179)

Joy Jacobson is the CHMP’s poet-in-residence. Follow her on Twitter: @joyjaco.

good nurseI have an odd confession. When I was the managing editor of the American Journal of Nursing for most of the 2000s, I kept a log of criminal nurses. I’m not entirely sure why; perhaps the nursing profession’s perennial lead in Gallup’s “honesty and ethics” poll made me want to explore its underbelly. Through periodic web searches I found more than a few “angels of death,” nurses who purported to end their patients’ suffering by murdering them with high doses of morphine or other drugs. I found rapists, thieves, addicts, pedophiles. But nothing ever matched the terrifying 16-year spree of critical care nurse and serial killer Charles Cullen.

Journalist Charles Graeber has written an engrossing book about Cullen, The Good Nurse: A True Story of Medicine, Madness and Murder. Graeber will be at Roosevelt House in New York (47-49 E 65th St., between Park and Madison Avenues) this Thursday at 6 PM, talking with health care journalist Charles Ornstein and nurse attorney Edie Brous about Cullen’s pattern of killing in various New Jersey and Pennsylvania hospitals. Hospitals, Bad Practitioners, and Accountability: Lessons from the Case of Serial Killer Charles Cullen is free and open to the public. RSVP at centerhealthmediapolicy@gmail.com.

I found Graeber’s narrative style to be deeply affecting. Here he is describing one of Cullen’s earliest victims, the Rev. Florian Gall:

Charlie would study the man at night, his bald head glowing in the light of the machines, his clerical vestments exchanged for a disposable frock. He looked nothing like the priests of Charlie’s youth, nothing like God’s man on earth—he looked sick, and very human. That was his prognosis. Charlie knew the charts, he’d pulled the little computer cart to the corner of the Cardiac Care Unit to pore through the drama of numbers.

Rev. Florian Gall coded at approximately 9:32 AM the morning of June 28. He went unexpectedly into cardiac arrest, and heroic measures were undertaken. They were unsuccessful. His time of death was noted in his chart: 10:10 AM. Gall’s bloodwork showed that his digoxin levels were off the charts.

The Somerset Medical Center administration had a problem. It was not a natural death. And Gall wasn’t the first. They called him “Patient 4.”

Cullen himself knew that the hospitals that employed him permitted his long career as a killer. In a 60 Minutes segment (online in two parts: here and here) on Graeber’s book and the investigation that ended in Cullen’s confession in 2003, Steve Kroft asked Cullen: How could he have been passed off from one hospital to the next, receiving good or neutral references? Why did no one go to the police when it became obvious that Cullen was implicated in patient deaths? Cullen blinked as though blinded by the sun: “I think because it’s a matter of worrying about lawsuits. If they pointed out here was a problem they would be liable for millions of dollars.”

Having spent seven years investigating the case, and interviewing Cullen a dozen times, Graeber chose to tell the story as a story, one in which on every page I came face to face with what was at stake for so many. (Cullen admitted to having murdered as many as 40 patients, but Graeber estimates the number may be 10 times that.) Graeber painstakingly reveals his sources but only in his endnotes, thus allowing the reader to feel the impact of Cullen’s choices, patient after patient, as well as the legalistic horrors that allowed him to continue to practice and the heroic efforts of Cullen’s fellow nurse, Amy Loughren, who finally urged him to confess. As one reviewer put it, “Graeber has accomplished something remarkable: he’s allowed himself the freedom to construct the main narrative for maximum impact while never jeopardizing our trust.”

I hope you’ll participate in what should be a fascinating conversation.

Joy Jacobson is the CHMP’s poet-in-residence. Follow

This is a guest post by Molly Lupo, a Nurse Practitioner who is passionate about oncology. Her experience spans the continuum of nursing. She began her career as a certified nursing assistant (CNA) on a Medical-Surgical floor then returned to school to obtain her Bachelor of Science in Nursing. Upon completing her nursing degree, she went on to work as a registered nurse in an inpatient oncology unit.  She also has experience in teaching undergraduate nursing students, and currently is a Nurse Practitioner in Texas.

MollyThe alarm goes off at 5 a.m. I get up to work out before going to work. Check. I thank my lucky stars for my health, because not everybody is blessed to wake up every day with their health. In fact, a lot of people wake up fighting for their lives where I work. Is it sad? Maybe some days. But, not all days.

I show up to the outpatient clinic eager and excited to see the patients for the day. I check labs, I make note of any abnormalities, check for any new imaging scans, and read up on the patient’s histories. We start rounding. Most everyone is doing pretty well considering the circumstances. Like I said, these people are fighters. They don’t give up.

We arrive to one middle-aged man’s room where he’s receiving fluids so as to prevent other complications related to his treatment. His wife starts crying. But, she’s not sad. She’s happy. She’s very happy. She’s happy because while she has been by her husband’s side from day one of diagnosis, helping him fight, not missing a day with him, they both got a day off from coming to the clinic everyday. They got a break from getting poked for blood, waiting for a room, waiting to be seen. So she was crying, because she was so happy and grateful she got to sit and watch a movie with him. She was happy he had energy to stay awake all day. She’s happy because she got to walk around one block with him. One block. She’s happy because she got a sense of what life used to be like, when it was normal. She is so grateful.

So, my job isn’t always sad. Sometimes, it is quite uplifting. And most days, it makes you a bit more appreciative of every little single thing you have, including having your husband there to take a walk with you, and watch a show. Remember? I told you, these patient’s are fighters, they don’t give up.

written by Molly Lupo

This is a guest post by Molly

CHMP Senior Fellow Liz Seegert wrote this article for the Connecticut Health Investigative Team [C-HIT],  a web-based news service dedicated to producing original, responsible, in-depth journalism on issues of health and safety, in Connecticut and the surrounding region. C-HIT’s team of award-winning journalists provide the public with informative stories about health, safety and medical issues.

 

Nancy Cappello wants all women to receive the same opportunities for breast cancer screening that women in Connecticut have had for years.

Cappello, who worked for passage of the state’s 2009 breast density notification law, has taken her cause nationally – advocating for similar legislation in every state and lobbying policymakers in Washington D.C.

Connecticut’s law — the first of its kind in the country — requires radiologists to inform women who undergo mammography if they are diagnosed with dense breast tissue, a condition known to obscure cancer detection. These “inform” reports must reference potential benefits of supplemental screening such as an MRI or ultrasound. So far, 11 states have followed Connecticut’s lead by passing similar laws.

read the rest of the story here

CHMP Senior Fellow Liz Seegert wrote this