Connect with Healthcetera
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 279)

On February 23, 2012 Nancy Schwartzman will present her critically acclaimed short film, THE LINE and it’s companion media campaign to empower young leaders to end sexual violence. The film is our first event in the Center for Health, Media & Policy’s HEALTH in FILM & NEW MEDIA spring series.

THE LINE is a documentary about a young woman – the filmmaker- who is raped, but her story isn’t cut and dry. Not a “perfect victim,” the filmmaker confronts her attacker, recording the conversation with a hidden camera. Sex workers, survivors and activists discuss justice, accountability and today’s “rape culture.” The film asks the question: where is the line defining consent?

Nancy’s WHERE IS YOUR LINE CAMPAIGN believes that documentary films can create social change, with the right partners and the right platforms. WHERE IS YOUR LINE is a non-profit organization and movement that is committed to empowering young leaders to create a world without sexual violence. Nancy will show us how the campaign is creating critical dialogues and new media to inspire action.

Join us for a fascinating and thought-provoking evening!

**************************
CHMP’s Health in Film & New Media Series presents:

the-line_mila-hands
 

THE LINE

  a film and campaign to end sexual violence
Thursday, February 23, 2012 – 6pm
CUNY School of Public Health at Hunter College
MAIN AUDITORIUM, 2nd FLOOR
2180 Third Avenue at 119th Street
New York, NY 10035
Directions: 6 train to 116th OR 4/5/6 to 125th

Event is FREE.
Seating is limited and RSVPs are essential. Please respond as soon as possible: chmp@hunter.cuny.edu

Presentation to follow with Director Nancy Schwartzman

MORE INFO:

THE LINE  is about a one night stand far from home that goes terribly wrong. As the filmmaker unravels her experience, she decides to confront her attacker. Told through a “sex-positive” lens, The Line is a 24 minute documentary about a young woman – the filmmaker- who is raped, but her story isn’t cut and dry. Not a “perfect victim,” the filmmaker confronts her attacker, recording the conversation with a hidden camera. Sex workers, survivors and activists discuss justice, accountability and today’s “rape culture.” The film asks the question: where is the line defining consent? Shown in film festivals around the world, The Line was released in September 2009, and is a top selling film with educational distributor, the Media Education Foundation. http://whereisyourline.org/film/

CENTER FOR HEALTH, MEDIA & POLICY: http://centerforhealthmediapolicy.com/
The Hunter College Center for Health, Media and Policy is an interdisciplinary initiative for advancing the health of the public and healthy public policies through effective interactions with new and traditional media. The Center is a catalyst for shaping professional and public conversations about health and health care by focusing on the intersection between policy and media. CHMP works with public health advocates and health care professionals to raise their voices to influence policies that will create a more equitable and cost-effective health care system.

THIS EVENT IS CO-SPONSORED WITH:
CUNY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: http://www.cuny.edu/site/sph.html
HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION CENTER: http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/shp/centers/hpec/
HEALTH EQUITY INITIATIVE: http://www.healthequityinitiative.org/

On February 23, 2012 Nancy Schwartzman will

We know that many innovations require a sea change in the culture of organizations or society. This is particularly so when trying to spark innovations that can transform our health care system. On January 26th, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)held an Innovations Summit that they hoped would spark new ideas for achieving the “triple aim” of better health of people, better health care, and lower health care costs. But there were signs that the cultural change that is needed to turn around our dysfunctional health care system maybe more engrenched thatn we thought.

The first sign of trouble was the “networking breakfast” where nary a piece of fruit–not even fruit juice–or speck of protein was available amidst the plates of muffins and other pastries. So much for walking the talk about health eating. Good thing Michelle wasn’t there…

The second sign of trouble was the opening presentation by Don Casey, chief executive officer of West Wireless Health Institute, who providing an opening commercial for his organization. The commercials were interspersed throughout the day when some speakers spoke about their companies’ innovations. Granted, Acting Administrator of CMS and nurse Marilyn Tavenner (her credentials were not included in the program, although all of the physicians had their MD credentials included and Atul Gawande even listed his MPH) noted that the way forward would be through public and private partnerships.

The third sign of trouble became apparent by lunch.

We know that many innovations require a sea change in the culture of organizations or society. This is particularly so when trying to spark innovations that can transform our health care system. On January 26th, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)held an Innovations Summit that they hoped would spark new ideas for achieving the “triple aim” of better health of people, better health care, and lower health care costs. But there were signs that the cultural change that is needed to turn around our dysfunctional health care system maybe more engrenched thatn we thought.

The first sign of trouble was the “networking breakfast” where nary a piece of fruit–not even fruit juice–or speck of protein was available amidst the plates of muffins and other pastries. So much for walking the talk about health eating. Good thing Michelle wasn’t there…

The second sign of trouble was the opening presentation by Don Casey, chief executive officer of West Wireless Health Institute, who providing an opening commercial for his organization. The commercials were interspersed throughout the day when some speakers spoke about their companies’ innovations. Granted, Acting Administrator of CMS and nurse Marilyn Tavenner (her credentials were not included in the program, although all of the physicians had their MD credentials included and Atul Gawande even listed his MPH) noted that the way forward would be through public and private partnerships.

The third sign of trouble became apparent by lunch.

sgk-logo_topNews of the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s decision – and quick reversal – to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood was a textbook case of the power of social media. Tweet after tweet, post after post on Facebook, the blogosphere, You Tube, reader comments on hundreds of message boards, discussion groups, chat rooms – almost every type of social media tool available was a delivery channel for emotional advocacy of the two organizations.

The New York Times reported that by week’s end, some 1.3 million tweets relating to the funding issue had been sent. Facebook users by the thousands shared links declaring “I Still Stand with Planned Parenthood.” or passed along the message “Don’t Throw Planned Parenthood Under the Bus.”

One website that tracks Facebook estimated some 20 posts per minute were made for and against the two organizations. Planned Parenthood advocates charged that the decision was based on politics and increased pressure by staunch conservatives. Komen pointed to a policy that negated funding for organizations that were under investigation. Many Komen supporters, however, including grassroots affiliates, strongly disagreed with the organization’s stand. Supporters were angered that breast cancer screening was becoming such as sectarian issue.

breastexamsign-e1328568852603The Facebook posts I saw last week communicated a sense of outrage. Planned Parenthood provides breast cancer screening services for low-income and minority women – those that are often most vulnerable and least able to obtain quality care. It was more than a so-called “pro-choice” vs. “pro-life” argument. The broad support shown by so many people, across multiple social media platforms was a clear statement that women’s health issues matter.

Online users on both sides of the issue, who had never considered themselves activists,  joined in this virtual conflagration; messages flew back and forth so fast that it was hard to keep up at times. It was really amazing to watch all of the activity unfold in real time. Many who commented also followed up with financial donations to these organizations; Planned Parenthood reported they raised over $3 million in just a few days, well beyond the roughly $700K they would have lost from Komen. Big names like the Fikes Foundation and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg made news by pledging substantial financial support.

After just a few days of unrelenting criticism that even reached into Congress, Komen did an about face. Planned Parenthood’s current funding was reinstated and the organization will be eligible for future grant considerations. Once again, social media buzzed loudly with opinions on the news — did Komen executives “cave in” as conservatives charge, or was the online noise so overwhelming that they had no other option?

The Komen Foundation will be dealing with the fallout from this incident for quite some time. It is a real-time case study of social media’s effectiveness. Twitter, Facebook, and other Web 2.0 tools have again shown their value – helping to bring down dictators, overthrow governments, keep people connected during natural disasters.. as well as PR disasters generated by organizations that still underestimate their noise.

News of the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s