Connect with Healthcetera
Friday, April 19, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 303)

Senior Fellow Liz Seegert, MA is a healthcare journalist, writer, and consultant with a focus on social and human welfare

net-too-much-mediaYesterday’s 5.8 earthquake along the east coast was not only unusual and unsettling, but also triggered memoriesof the 9/11 attacks for many people in New York City and the Washington DC area. Although most quickly realized what was going on, there was that moment of uncertainty.

Once the danger has passed, most people return to normal functioning. Fear is a normal response to danger or the unknown, adaptive for our survival and hardwired into the brain. “We are supposed to be afraid in an earthquake,” said Alison Pratt, PhD, a psychologist from Floral Park, NY.  If the symptoms are still there several months after the event without improvement, or in fact, getting worse, it may be post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and more serious intervention is warranted.

Naturally the media was all over this story; local TV, radio, and online newspaper coverage was virtually nonstop all afternoon, social media sites were overwhelmed; hundreds of postings appeared within minutes. Of course, video of the quake was played, and replayed, on air and online – home video, cell phone video, professional video… name it and it was on You Tube, Cable TV, Facebook, and just about any other available media outlet.

According to Dr. Pratt, people who have experienced trauma respond in different ways, depending on their coping style. Some people are “avoiders” and do best turning off the news. Others feel a great comfort in connecting with other people and sharing memories, telling their story again. “There is no right or wrong way to deal with these things. But for people with PTSD, data is on the side of therapy plus medication.”

Research confims the link between watching media coverage of highly traumatic events and PTSD symptoms in survivors. Stress levels can rise dramatically stress and cause past survivors to relive horrible events. On the other hand, it is the job of the media to report the news – part of that responsibility often includes showing video of unpleasant or emotionally stressful situations.

The news media has to answer the question of “how much is too much?” Does the public’s right to know outweigh the potential mental distressof victims or survivors of traumatic events? It’s a delicate balancing act.

Watching video of violent events has been shown to desensitize viewers to violence and even leads to delay in helping others in need. What effect does repeat broadcasts of planes flying into the World Trade Center, or people jumping fro the 99th floor, or running for their lives in a daze as the towers fall have on the mental health of those who were there that day?

Should the media take near-certain stress and mental trauma of survivors and families into account as they prepare the nightly news footage? At what point does it become overdone? If it’s news, should it even matter?

As the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11th attacks draws near, news media needs to consider these questions carefully.

Senior Fellow Liz Seegert, MA is a

Whoopi Goldberg

Whoopi Goldberg

In 2002, I was the editor-in-chief of the American Journal of Nursing, the lead organizer of a state of the science symposium on urinary incontinence. The recommendations were published by the journal in 2003 and included a public education campaign. At the symposium, we talked about how we needed a public figure to be the spokesperson for such a campaign, but who would want to admit to not being able to control his or her urine?

So I was amazed to see Whoopi Goldberg as the lead spokesperson for a Kimberly-Clark ad campaign for “Poise“, a new pad designed for women with LBL–“Light Bladder Leakage”. I went to the designated  web site for this is a very clever and funny ad campaign and laughed out loud at Whoopi’s portrayal of Cleopatra, the Statue of Liberty, Joan of Arc, and other women of history who are held up as examples of women who had LBL. Whoopi talks about her own experiences with it and says she calls it the “Spritz”.

Why are we now talking about “light bladder leakage”? Kimberly-Clark must have conducted focus groups with women who said they didn’t have urinary incontinence–which people today associate with Depends, another Kimberly-Clark product that has become a staple of comedy routines–but rather leaked a little water from their bladder sometimes.  As the campaign and Whoopi point out, 1 in 3 women experience LBL. So this is a huge potential market for Kimberly-Clark.

Here’s the rub. Some women are reluctant to leave the house or go places where they aren’t confident they’ll be able to access a bathroom when they need one. The Poise pads could provide a solution for such women. But I couldn’t find Whoopi saying anything about important preventive measures such as losing weight, pelvic floor exercises to tighten the muscles that can shut off urine flow, and reducing caffeine intake.

The site does have a section on “Learn about LBL” that includes these solutions but I’m disappointed that Whoopi didn’t insist on a script that allowed her to emphasize going to this part of the web site.

According to the campaign, LBL can occur when you sneeze, laugh, cough, are squeezed, and other times that are everyday occurrences. So a woman would have to wear a pad everyday to catch that “light bladder leakage” whenever it occurred. Good for Kimberley-Clark’s profit margin, for sure. If the ad campaign raises women’s awareness about how to prevent even needing the pads, that will be a huge
public service.

What do you think of this ad campaign?

Diana J. Mason, PhD, RN, FAAN, Rudin Professor of Nursing and Co-Director, CHMP

[caption id="attachment_10366" align="alignleft" width="250"] Whoopi Goldberg[/caption] In 2002,

This is Senior Fellow Dr. Lyndon Haviland’s first blog post for CHMP. Dr. Haviland has more than 25 years experience in domestic and international public health. She brings broad expertise in management consulting, health policy, advocacy, social marketing, corporate social responsibility, and branding, as well as applied research design and evaluation.

Bowl of Colorful Fall Harvest

Bowl of Colorful Fall Harvest

I am obsessed with food – it’s one of the defining factors of my life.  I like to eat, I like to cook, I like to feed people, I like to talk about food, I like to read about food, and I just love to shop for food.  I think farm stands, and good grocery stores are little bits of heaven on earth.  And this year, I have become fascinated by my first kitchen garden.  With childish wonder, I have watched food grow and picked fruits and vegetables just in time to cook them.

Its summer in Connecticut, and so I am swimming in tomatoes and herbs – I am experimenting with new sauces, tarts, and soups.  The more I eat from my garden the healthier I feel.  It’s amazing to me, I am learning what we all should know, and that the closer we are to our food, the easier it is to make healthy food choices.  In fact, the fresher the food, the less I crave salt, fat and sugar.  And that’s good given my family history of heart disease and obesity and my personal struggles to attain and maintain a healthy weight.

You don’t need a degree in public health to believe that there is an epidemic of childhood obesity sweeping across America. Walk a city sidewalk, stroll in the mall and just take a quick look around at the number and size of our youngest citizens.  One in three children in America today are overweight, and that has profound implications for their future wellbeing.  Being obese is bad for a child’s physical health, but the stigma associated with being overweight or obese is damaging to children’s mental health as well.  Teachers as well students have a well documented negative perception of obese children. “Research now shows that future peer victimization can be predicted by a child’s weight.”

Many of the responses to this preventable and dangerous epidemic include bringing children closer to their food and providing healthy food choices. There are no easy answers, but there is a lot of excitement from Michelle Obama’s leadership in “Let’s Move” to New York’s  Wellness in the Schools program led by chef Bill Telepan   or the burgeoning movement for schoolyard gardens.

That’s why on the  morning of August 17 NPR’s business news rocked my world.  Target, the nation’s second largest discount retailer beat their earnings expectations (during the current financial down turn) because of their decision to become a “grocery shopping destination.”

NPR reported that Target’s overall sales were up, but most of the expanded earnings came from their increased food offerings.  I shop at Target, and I love their attitude, it’s fun and I think they do a great job with paper products, inexpensive home wares, and seasonal party supplies, but when I think food shopping, Target is not my destination.

According to their website, SuperTarget wants to make grocery shopping “fun, easy and affordable.” The website stresses all they ways that Target is a good food purveyor – their designation as a USDA certified organic produce retailer (since 2006), their commitment to meals on a budget, their “better for you options,” and their reformulation of all Archer Farms (their home brand) with zero grams transfat.   So this morning, I went grocery shopping at Target.

First the good news, the aisles were wide, the store was well lit, and sale items were easily identifiable.  It was easy to see the appeal.  Target obviously understands its core clientele, every aisle included single serving portions energy drinks, juice boxes, cheese sticks, 100 calorie packs of crackers or cookies, individual tuna salads, presliced apples, prewashed small bags of carrots and grapes,  and no refrigeration necessary pudding packs. I was overwhelmed at the sheer volume of food that can be individually wrapped and sold. Not all of it was appealing and certainly much of it fails to be a “better for you” food option.  And since I love to cook, I don’t understand how some of the product reformulation could actually work – what is in a strawberry cupcake from Hostess that allows it to be 100 calories and 0 grams transfat?

In the fresh food section, the offerings were more limited, but again convenience and cleanliness was the order of the day.  You could easily shop for school lunches here and please your children well, and Target’s frozen foods included a wide range of prepared foods with an emphasis on simple reheating. A huge sign across one of the freezers summed up their philosophy “eat well, pay less.”

In these economic times, eating well and paying less is great, but the reality at Target was the sheer volume of the processed food far outweighed the “better for you options.”   If Target wants to help us eat well, they should eliminate or limit the unhealthy food products or prioritize their healthy food options.  This week of 22 sale items highlighted on their website, only 4 were for healthy foods.  Why not discount the healthy and fresh food, since the not so healthy and frozen options have a longer shelf life?

SuperTarget should offer discounts on superfoods and not discounts on foods that will supersize their customers.  The economics are clear – healthy customers live to shop longer.  Making it easier for all of us to stay healthy makes good business sense.

This is Senior Fellow Dr. Lyndon Haviland's