Connect with Healthcetera
Saturday, April 20, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 311)

This was originally posted on Bronx Health REACH’s blog Making Health Equality a Reality on May 3, 2011

bronx-health-reach-logoAccording to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), nearly 4,000 youth under age 18 try their first cigarette each day in the United States and an additional 1,000 become daily smokers. In the Bronx, 3,000 public high school students are current smokers (NYC Department of Health, 2009) and a third of them are likely to die prematurely from the effects of cigarette smoking, based on statewide data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

Tobacco companies market heavily to youth with the goal of finding and securing “replacement smokers.” The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids notes that tobacco industry internal documents identify children as young as 11 years old as a “key market.” A newly published FDA report indicates that 80% of black and 50% of Hispanic teens smoke menthol cigarettes such as Newport. This is particularly relevant to the Bronx, which is 91% black and Hispanic, according to the 2010 census. According to a report published this year by the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC), menthol cigarettes reinforce smoking behavior through their cooling “throat grab”, which reduces the aversion to nicotine among new smokers, thus promoting continued use leading to addiction. One manufacturer of a menthol-containing brand that is extremely popular among black and Hispanic teens, notes: “[T]he base of our business is the high school student.”

 

Although cigarette companies claim that they have discontinued intentional marketing to youth through targeted ads and promotional items, they have found another powerful venue for the promotion and sale of their products—the local neighborhood store. The corner store is a favored stop off point for youth on their way to and from school. A recent Bronx community mapping survey showed that 85% of these establishments are located within a five block radius of a school. Cigarette and spit-tobacco companies continue to advertise heavily at these stores with large ads and signs clearly visible from the outside.

 

On June 22, 2010, the FDA issued a new ruling designed to limit the effect of tobacco advertising on youth.

Among other things, the rule:

  • Prohibits the sale of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco to people younger than 18,
  • Prohibits the sale of cigarette packages with less than 20 cigarettes,
  • Prohibits distribution of free samples of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco, and
  • Prohibits gifts or other items in exchange for buying cigarettes or smokeless tobacco products.

To ensure compliance, the FDA has promised to conduct unannounced inspections of local retail establishments and to impose “enforcement action,” which could include warning letters, civil money penalties, and orders prohibiting the future sale of tobacco products.

While these provisions are important, they do not address the key issue of tobacco signage in local neighborhood stores. In the Bronx, this is a major issue, due to their proximity to schools, and the tendency of many to violate the FDA ruling by selling small quantities of cigarettes and other tobacco products to youth, and failure to verify their age at the time of sale.

What can communities do? Bronx Health REACH (BHR) has spent the last few months as a community contractor with the Bronx Smoke-Free partnership under a grant funded by the New York City Department of Health. We have met with local members of the Assembly, Senate and City Council to encourage their continued advocacy and support of smoking prevention and cessation efforts in the Bronx, which has one of the city’s highest overall smoking rates and highest pediatric asthma hospitalization rate. In addition, we have met with Community Boards 3 and 5, representatives from our key target schools in Districts 7 and 9, and members of our Faith-Based Outreach Coalition to inform and sensitize them to the issue of youth-focused tobacco marketing in the local retail market.

Bronx Health REACH is currently working with eight schools under the New York State Department of Health-funded HEA+LTHY Schools NY program to bolster school wellness policies focusing on nutrition, physical fitness and tobacco prevention. It has also encouraged its faith-based coalition to actively engage their youth groups in tobacco prevention advocacy, since youth are the target of tobacco marketing efforts. Several youth groups in member churches have already been sensitized to the importance of healthy eating through participation in the God’s Health Squad program, a multi-unit participatory curriculum that covers key concepts related to nutrition, fitness, good health and positive body image. REACH staff and members of the Bronx Smoke-Free Partnership will work with these same youth groups in targeting local retailers to encourage them to remove tobacco signage outside their stores and reduce tobacco product visibility inside.

This was originally posted on Bronx Health

Robert Wood Johnson Press release

Diana Mason, editor-in-chief emeritus of the American Journal of Nursing, joins RWJF campaign to improve health care by transforming nursing.

Published: May 23, 2011

Diane R.N., Ph.D., F.A.A.N.

American Journal of Nursing Editor-in-Chief Emeritus

Problem: Nurses are among those on the frontier of the nation’s health care system, meeting challenges with innovative solutions that improve patient outcomes and save money. Yet too often, these nurse-led success stories are not featured in national discussions about how to improve health and health care. As a result, nurse innovators are not being written about or funded, and their solutions are not replicated as quickly or on a grand scale.

Background: When Diana Mason was a little girl, she had her tonsils removed to prevent recurring throat infections. One nurse who treated her—the nurse she dubbed the “good” one—allowed her to eat ice cream during her recovery. Another one—the nurse she thought of as the “bad” one—did not. “I decided then that I wanted to be a good nurse when I grew up,” Mason recalls.

Fast forward to 2011, and that is exactly what she has become: a good nurse, in all senses of the word.

During a long and productive career, Mason, R.N., Ph.D., F.A.A.N., has served her country as an army nurse, served patients as a clinical nurse, served aspiring nurses as a nurse educator, and served the public as a talk show host, journalist and editor.

For more than 10 years, she was editor-in-chief of the American Journal of Nursing (AJN), the oldest circulating nursing journal in the world. She is now the Rudin Professor of Nursing at Hunter College at the City University of New York, where she co-founded and co-directs the Center for Health, Media and Policy.

Mason was recently appointed by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) to serve as Strategic Advisor to the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action, a collaborative effort to implement solutions to the challenges facing the nursing profession, and to build upon nurse-based approaches to improving quality and transforming the way Americans receive health care.

In this capacity, she will consult on the implementation of the recommendations of a groundbreaking report released last year by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) about the future of the nursing profession. She will serve as a national spokesperson for the campaign.

Through it all, Mason has also found time to be a volunteer—and nurses and the patients they treat are better off as a result.

As a volunteer co-chair of Raise the Voice, a campaign of the American Academy of Nursing (AAN) that received funding from the Foundation and seeks to highlight nurse-led and nurse-designed solutions to health care challenges, Mason has sought to identify nurses who are on the frontier of health care.

Called Edge Runners, these nurses have developed new care models and interventions that demonstrate significantly better clinical and financial outcomes. Some have done so in the face of formidable institutional resistance.

They are nurses like Ruth Watson Lubic, Ed.D., C.N.M., an 84-year-old woman who turned a supermarket in a low-income neighborhood in Washington, D.C. into a modern birth center for low-income women. The center, which provides midwifery and nurse practitioner services and health care for women and children, has had dramatic results. After six years, it has lowered rates of pre-term birth, low-birthweight babies and cesarean-section deliveries; improved breastfeeding rates among new mothers; and yielded considerable health care savings.

Yet Lubic still has trouble raising funds to cover the costs of the birth center, despite its track record. That’s partly because these kinds of nurse-driven success stories are not being told in national discussions over how to improve health and health care, Mason says. As a result, they are not being written about, they’re not being funded, and they’re not being replicated on a nationwide scale.

Edge Runners like Lubic are among our nation’s “best-kept secrets,” Mason says. “Nurses are doing phenomenal things to meet the needs of underserved people. We have to do a better job making these solutions visible and promoting them to the public and to policy-makers.”

Solution: To spread the word, build support and encourage replication, Mason and her colleagues on the Raise the Voice campaign took a two-part strategy: They required aspiring Edge Runners to provide performance measures so that they could demonstrate clinical successes and cost savings, and they promoted nurse-driven solutions like Lubic’s to the national news media, donors and other stakeholders.

To do that, they formed partnerships with supportive organizations; hired a communications consultant to reach out to the media; recruited Edge Runners to speak on panels about nursing and health care; and held a press conference and a webcast about innovative models of care designed and led by nurses.

One particularly effective effort came a few years ago at a Washington, D.C., conference of the Association of Health Care Journalists. The Raise the Voice campaign managed to get a tour of Lubic’s shoe-string budget birth center on the Association’s itinerary after a stop at an opulent, high-tech “war room” at the Department of Health and Human Services.

The striking juxtaposition of wealth and poverty sparked interest among journalists on the tour, Mason says. “It was stunning. It was in-your-face. We couldn’t have planned it better.”

Mason also spread the word about nurse innovators in the IOM report, called The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. It calls for a transformation of the nursing profession, advances in nurse leadership, increased collaboration among providers from different disciplines, and reforms to the health care workforce in order to improve patient care.

For the report, Mason worked with former AJN managing editor Joy Jacobson to draft stories about Lubic and other Edge Runners who have succeeded in creating health care solutions that improve the quality of care and save money. These stories illustrate why it is important for nurses to be full partners, with physicians and other health professionals, in redesigning health care in the United States—one of the report’s key recommendations.

“These stories speak to the fact that nurses are out there innovating,” Mason says. “Nurses must be leaders in redesigning health care. Nurses must be at every table where health care is being redesigned and, in some cases, they must lead the redesign.”

Thanks to efforts like these, the word is beginning to get out. Mason cites a recent advertising campaign by UnitedHealthcare that features a man with prostrate cancer who is assigned a nurse who manages his care. “Nurses are central to the message in that ad,” Mason says. “That is really phenomenal.”

Low visibility is just one barrier to building sustainability and scalability of nurse-led models of care, Mason says. In addition to raising awareness, Raise the Voice is also working to identify health care institutions and systems that are hot-beds of innovation; help provide targeted nurse innovators with infrastructure support; and facilitate partnerships with interested parties and donors.

The biggest challenge to reaching those goals is lack of needed funds, Mason says. Funding from the Foundation enabled the campaign to build an infrastructure and sustain the project beyond the grant period, which ended in 2009. The board is now working to secure additional funding, Mason says: “We are sustaining it, but we want to do more. The Edge Runners program has become the key initiative of the American Academy of Nursing. People love it. The members love it. Even though we don’t have the all the funding we need, the Academy is still committed to the project. It is so important for nursing.”

RWJF Perspective: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is committed to supporting nurse-led models of care. In addition to support for the Raise the Voice campaign, the Foundation is funding The Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action, a collaborative effort to implement solutions to the challenges facing the nursing profession and to build upon nurse-based approaches to improving quality and transforming the way Americans receive health care.

 

Robert Wood Johnson Press release Diana Mason, editor-in-chief

Liz Seegert is a freelance health writer and adjunct instructor in Media and Communications for Empire State College.

nodtcqIs advertising prescription drugs directly to consumers a good thing?

It all depends on whom you ask. Some physicians complain of pressure from patients to put them on the new drug du jour, even when current medications are more than sufficient. Others believe that there is inherent educational value in drug ads; they raise awareness of a drug’s availability, associated symptoms, and possible need for treatment. Still others advocate limiting the role  of DCTA to general information and education, without specific product mention.

Most patients lack the clinical expertise to make judgments on the appropriateness of one medication over another. It is likely that most neglect to read the fine print, and tune out the faceless TV announcer listing contra-indications and side effects. What consumers see are those people in the ads – whether riding in a Mustang convertible or playing with their grandkid acting as if this drug is the next best thing to winning a Mega Millions lottery.

Of course it is. Advertising is designed to persuade and encourage purchases. So naturally drug benefits are presented in a very positive light while potential negatives are minimized. Any negatives are buried in the fine print or glossed over.

Does it work?  In Direct-to-Consumer Advertising and Online Search(2011)analysts from the Federal Trade Commission looked at DTCA’s relationship to subsequent online searches for drugs, drug classes, and health-related information. Their findings yielding some interesting trends. Print and online ad viewing led to an increase in searches for information about diseases and conditions. TV ads had much less impact on information related searches, but led to more drug-specific and drug class queries

What’s really going on? DCTA is apparently working. Consumers are responding. They are seeking out pertinent health information,participating in discussion groups, chat rooms, and finding support groups for their particular disease or condition.The growing popularity of sites such as Organized Wisdom, Patients Like Me and Diabetes.org reinforces the concept that consumers want to be educated and feel connected.

“Our analysis shows that consumers seek diverse information about prescription drugs online and their behavior is influenced by the online and offline advertising to which they are exposed…offline advertising increases not only the likelihood that a user searches for a drug, but also the intensity of search…” (Chesnes and Jin, 2011, 33).

So analysts think that DTCA has a “positive and significant effect” on in-depth searches, for specific drugs and for others in the same class. Television tends to drive consumers directly to a company website, which may lead to a broader informational search. I have been a long-time DTCA skeptic, but this latest analysis provides new evidence that it can be a springboard to help consumers gain additional knowledge about their condition and how best to treat it. As patients become more proactive in their care,“talk to your doctor” takes on a new meaning.


Liz Seegert is a freelance health writer