Connect with Healthcetera
Thursday, April 25, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 53)

Senior Fellow Kristi Westphaln, PhD(c) RN CPNP and a team of California nurse practitioners designed a six-session course on child health policy. These sessions are 15 minutes long.  You do not have to live in California. Details about this course are below with a link to register. 
 Navigating the child health policy arena may seem intimidating and complicated. Child-specific policy resources are sometimes scarce and traveling to health policy conferences may be challenging. The California NAPNAP Child Health Policy Coalition welcomes you to an innovative solution that coincides with our new year’s resolution: let’s get engaged in pediatric health policy!

Crafted by the passions and expertise of the legislative chairs and policy enthusiasts from the NAPNAP Chapters in Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, San Francisco and San Joaquin Valley, this pediatric health policy educational opportunity is our call to you to get involved. We present a variety of brief, multi-media educational sessions on an array of local and federal child health policies that are relatable and relevant to your practice.


Health Insurance in Children – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: six sessions, approximately 15-minutes long, include:

  1. Let’s Get National: Federal Implications for Pediatric Health Policy
  2. Human Trafficking and Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (CSEC)
  3. Let’s Get Local: State and Child health Policy Issues and Perspectives on Rural Health in California
  4. Updates on Full Practice Authority and Legal Issues Involving Nurse Practitioners
  5. Speak Out: Navigating the Gun Violence Epidemic with Sen. Richard Pan

You’ll earn 1.75 contact hours when you complete all six sessions in this course and walk away more confident in your role as a health care leader and advocate for child health advocacy.

You do not have to be a member of NAPNAP or live in California to take the module. You can register here.

Senior Fellow Kristi Westphaln, PhD(c) RN CPNP and

Maternal death rates have risen over the last decade and most deaths are preventable. Each year roughly 700 women die from pregnancy or delivery related complications. The Centers for Disease Control & Prevention states that the mortality ratio for African American women is more than three times that of white women. So why are so many more women of color dying of pregnancy-related deaths? According to one report, blood clots and preeclampsia are the leading causes of death for black women. Preeclampsia is a sudden onset of high blood pressure along with protein in the urine. White women are more likely to suffer from a higher rate of mental health issues, infection, and hemorrhage.

While disease complications are contributing factors, they do not entirely explain the vast differences in maternal health outcomes. Dr. Rewa Thompson, a Women’s  Health Practitioner and professor at Stony Brook University, shares the complexities surrounding maternal death and takes a closer look at racial bias. In addition, a recent nursing graduate shares her labor experience and perspective regarding the covert factors that persistently contribute to unfavorable outcomes for women of color.

Clink the link below to hear the podcast

Maternal death rates have risen over the

Michael DiBenedetto is a retired high school teach who grew up in the Catskill Mountains. Hunting was part of the culture and, for some families, an important source of food. When he got involved in tracking bald eagles and American eagles, he witnessed the effects of lead bullets on these birds of prey. When it enters a deer, the lead bullet splinters into minute particles that move throughout the deer. When birds of prey feed on the deer guts or carcasses, they can get severe lead poisoning that has a lasting effect on their brains and ability to hunt. He has witnessed lead-poisoned eagles be nurtured back to health, only to die because they no longer have the hunting instincts or brain function they need to find prey and survive.

So he became quite concerned when he was delivering food to a local food pantry in his community and discovered that they had venison in stock that hunters had graciously donated for use by needy families, including pregnant women and young children–those at highest risk for lead poisoning and its harmful effects. Some states require that such donations include an information sheet or label that alerts people to the fact that the venison may contain lead and that people should limit their intake of venison that has not be screened for lead. Other states actually require that venison be tested for lead before being donated to food pantries.

California has banned lead bullets because the lead poisoning was wiping out the condor population. But hunters and the National Rifle Association oppose such bans, despite the fact that there are alternative bullets that do not contain lead and are more accurate when fired.

I was dumbfounded when I spoke with Michael about the situation. In particular, I struggled to understand why a hunter would put his own family and friends at risk by using lead bullets and thus contaminating the venison that they ate. I am not opposed to responsible hunting and I love venison. But why would a hunter use lead bullets if they are toxic to wildlife and humans? The root of the problem seems related to why our country hasn’t banned assault weapons, even after multiple mass shootings with AR-15s and other semi-automatic weapons. It’s not about logic and the science. It’s about ideology.

I interviewed Michael DiBenedetto about the effects of lead bullets and what can be done to discourage their use. The interview aired recently on my radio program, HealthCetera in the Catkills, on WIOX Radio in Roxbury, NY. You can listen to it here:

Michael DiBenedetto is a retired high school