Connect with Healthcetera
Monday, April 29, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 187)

This is  repost by guest blogger Sybil Shalo Wilmont originally published in Columbia Journalism Review.  Sibyl Shalo Wilmont is a healthcare journalist and emergency department nurse with insider experience in the pharmaceutical industry, academic medicine, and patient advocacy. She is a graduate student in Hunter College’s dual-degree Master’s in Community/Public Health Nursing/Master’s in Public Health program. Follow her on Twitter @nursesibyl.

The other night, my father, a lawyer, sat down with a fistful of hospital-related news clippings—as he often does when we haven’t seen each other for a while—and began to read aloud this headline from a blurb in the New York State Law Digest:

Hospital owes no general duty to drunk patient, brought in by friend, to bar him from leaving hospital.

You know that sound effect they play on kiddie shows, the one that sounds like a record being yanked off a turntable? That’s what I heard over my father’s voice as he continued reading. The blurb summarized a June New York State Court of Appeals decision that, although it changes absolutely nothing about the way healthcare providers and hospitals care for intoxicated patients, offers valuable insights into the moral and ethical underpinnings of our pubic health philosophy, which values autonomy over paternalism—even when people might not be making the best decisions for themselves.

A little digging revealed a bounty of legal and insurance trade coverage and analysis of the case, but almost nothing in the way of consumer press. Two reporters for small New York newspapers figured the case of Kowalski v. St. Francis was at least important enough to cover as the local news that it was. Chris Valdez, an investigative reporter at the Poughkeepsie Journal, and Hudson Valley Reporter editor Bob Dumas wrote the only two non-trade pieces about the case I could find since the June 26th ruling.

Briefly, the 2006 case involved a severely alcohol-intoxicated man (Kevin Kowalski) who was brought to the St. Francis Hospital ED in Poughkeepsie, NY by a friend to be voluntarily admitted to the hospital’s detox program. While waiting for a transfer to the program, he told a nurse that he wanted to take a taxi and leave. She told him to call a friend to come pick him up and he agreed, but walked out of the building when the nurse wasn’t looking.  (continue reading here)

 

 

 

This is  repost by guest blogger Sybil

Bronx Health REACH is one of 44 centers in the nation that focuses on reducing health disparities. REACH stands for Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health and these centers have been successful in making a dent on the persistent disparities in health outcomes and access to care for underserved, ethnically diverse populations. These disparities are costly to the nation to the tune of $1.24 trillion from 2003-2006.

Their funding has come primarily from the CDC–the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But in 2013, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebeius decided to take money from a preventive health fund mandated in the Affordable Care Act to pay for educating the public about the new state and federal health insurance exchanges that will expand access to affordable health insurance coverage. The CDC cut the funding for the REACH programs, including transitional money to  support the programs while they sought other funding.  The Obama administration has gone a step further and zeroed out all monies for the REACH programs in the proposed 2014 budget.

What difference will this make to our city’s and nation’s efforts to reduce health disparities? Tonight on Healthstyles, producer and moderator Diana Mason, RN, PhD, poses this question to guest Charmaine Ruddock, MS, Project Director of BronxHealth REACH.

So tune in tonight at 11:00 to WBAI, 99.5 FM, NYC; or listen anytime by clicking here:

Healthstyles is sponsored by the Center for Health, Media & Policy at Hunter College, City University of New York.

Bronx Health REACH is one of 44

This is CHMP’s third blog post adding to the public conversation during National Health IT Week  9/16-9/20/13  #NHITweek 

 

6062248667_9ddfb91da2Are older adults ready to embrace health technology?

According to a recent study in the Journal of Gerontological Nursing, they’re not only ready, but eager to do so.

This small study looked at how seniors view technology and how that influences adoption of new tools or concepts. That view is affected by the senior’s life course — the time and place he or she grew up, as well as the main factors of the diffusion of innovations theory. Essentially, if seniors think the technology will help them, can test it out, find it relatively simple to use, feel it aligns with their needs and values, and can see tangible benefits, they will use it. *For the purposes of this study, “technology” generally encompassed computers, cell phones, and basic health IT, such as remote monitoring.*

A series of focus groups found that older adults are justifiably concerned about issues like privacy, user-friendliness, training and available support. Seniors also said that they are often frustrated with current technology, perceiving it as “overly complicated and cumbersome to use and learn.”

Another theme which emerged from these focus groups is how technology can help to maintain or improve physical and mental capabilities. Games, puzzles and competitions were cited as types of activities these seniors enjoyed and use to help keep their minds sharp.

Researchers found strong support for tele-health use for routine medical care – especially among those living in rural areas. Many study participants already connect with health providers remotely. Less need to travel to major hubs and more efficient services were cited as key benefits. The study also revealed that seniors lack awareness of the health benefits of many current technologies. They were also critical of current technology design – from online gaming to cell phones – which fails to account for older adults’ preferences and perceptions. In one discussion, participants pointed to cell phones as overly complex and visually challenging; most only wanted them for making phone calls.

Importantly, researchers confirmed that older adults want to learn more about technology and how it can help them maintain independence and quality of life. While the majority of participants were unaware of the wide range of existing technology to address their health needs, most said they would be very willing to learn if it helped them to maintain mental and physical health. They also suggested that developers give more consideration to older adults by making hardware and software more user-friendly to facilitate adoption.

This cohort provided strong qualitative evidence that older adults generally respond positively to technology. Larger studies, quantitative data, and more detailed analysis of senior-specific tech is needed to truly understand older adults’ needs and overcome real or perceived barriers.

The easier we make it for older adults to adopt emerging health technologies, the more likely it is that many seniors will be able to age in place longer, enhance their social connections, and maintain a good quality of life.

This is CHMP’s third blog post adding