Connect with Healthcetera
Monday, April 29, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 353)

Every time I hear or read the term “health extension worker” (HEW) I cringe.  This visceral reaction happened today when I clicked on a link from a Tweet posted on Twitter by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. I landed on a new post by Melinda French Gates “Walking the Walk to Save Children’s Lives”  that included a short video. The story features an Ethiopian community health worker, Mahmunda, and her work caring for the families and children in rural Ethiopia over a one hundred mile radius.  The article refers to her as “… one of those health extension workers who deliver essential health services to families in rural communities.”

What is the history of this term? How did we assign a title to a person in such an important community role an extender? Why can’t we refer to them as community health workers?  Partners in Population and Development (PPD) works in Ethiopia providing resources to train HEWs to provide health care to the people in rural Ethiopia, accounting for more than 84 percent of Ethiopians. Their training program,  Ethiopian Health Extension Programme , aims to dramatically increase the number of these health workers.  “By 2010, 30,000 health extension workers (HEWs), almost all young women from the communities they serve, will be trained and distributed in pairs to live and work at the village-level throughout the country.”

These young women train for one year and learn disease prevention and control, family health, hygiene and environmental sanitation, and health education and communication. They provide immunizations and work in close collaboration with voluntary workers, such as community-based reproductive health agents (CBRHA) to provide reproductive health and family planning services at the household level.

We must ramp up the number of health care workers to meet the world’s health care needs and these health care community workers bring health closer to the homes of the people of Ethiopia most marginalized communities. They cannot work alone. We must train more physicians, nurses, midwives, clinical officers, laboratory technicians and pharmacists to work together to address this need.

Two words that begin with the letter “e” essential and extension are used when referring to these health care workers.  This mostly all women work force of community health workers are often selected by their own communities for the training.  I think they deserve a title that reflects the autonomous function as health care workers that they are supporting the primary health care needs of their communities. When more professionals join their ranks I hope they engage them in collaboration and learn from them on how best to serve their people.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waSCnQLTf3I&feature=player_embedded]

Every time I hear or read the

Dr. Ivan Oransky, a member of CHMP’s advisory board as well as the executive editor of Reuters Health, wrote an article that was featured today in The New Republic.  The article is entitled, “Can Stem Cells Treat Paralysis?  First Big Test Underway”.  In the article, Dr. Oransky debriefs readers about the newly, and very first, FDA-approved Phase I trial of embryonic stem cells in humans.  According to Dr. Oransky, the goal is to grow nervous system cells from human embryonic stem cells in order to help repair damaged neural tissue in human spinal cords.  To learn more about this trial and what it means for the stem cell debate, check out Dr. Oransky’s article in the New Republic.

Update: On October 14 Dr. Oransky was quoted in the NY Times article “Harvard Researchers Retract a Claim on the Aging of Stem Cells”

Dr. Ivan Oransky, a member of CHMP’s

The Institute of Medicine’s new report on the Future of Nursing was constructed by an interdisciplinary committee that included physicians. The committee’s mantra is that the report’s recommendations were developed with a focus on what will improve health care in the U.S. and the health of its people. The recommendations acknowledge that nurses can and must play leadership roles in redesigning and providing care. (This video [wpvideo yVyoTAfH]features former AARP CEO Bill Novelli talking about the importance of nurses leading in the redesign of health care; he was a member of the IOM Committee.) This doesn’t mean nurses run everything but that they are key members of interdisciplinary teams and may lead these teams, as nurses already do in some places.

So it was quite disappointing to see the response of the American Medical Association to the report.  Organized medicine continues to frame their arguments through a lens of quality and safety. But it’s a false argument, as the evidence in the IOM report documents.

The AMA response also reflects a poor understanding of what is needed in a transformed health care system. If we’re to improve the health of people while reducing costs, we must shift to a focus on health promotion, chronic care management, care coordination, and self-care management. Physicians are not prepared to provide these services.

The AMA (and others who want to better understand the current turf battle waged by organized medicine) should read legal scholar Barbara Safriet’s work, including her section of the IOM report on the Future of Nursing. She documents that medical practice acts were written so broadly that they try to encompass all of health care. In today’s world, the knowledge explosion should force us to consider who is educated to do what piece of health care. Safriet has delineated the statutory and regulatory changes that are needed to support contemporary interprofessional practice that can be led by professionals that can include not just physicians but nurses, social workers, psychologists, and others.

I would argue that nursing is the profesison that educates its practitioners about the physical, psychological, social, and environimental dimensions of individuals, families, and communities. This education prepares nurses to bring an important, holistic vision to the work of health care and positions them to be great leaders of interdisciplinary teams. But context is also important and team leadership should not be the purview of any one profession. TCAB, Transfroming Care At the Bedside (an initiative for improving care in acute care facilities that uses nurses and other providers of care as change agents), demonstrated that sometimes the best person to lead the team initiative may be a nursing assistant. And a social worker would probably be the best person to lead an interdisciplinary team (that includes physicians and nurses) that provides care to people with chronic mental illness who have established solid relationships with their community mental health service.

The AMA needs to examine its motives and aims. This is the time to focus on what people need to promote their health in affordable, accessible, equitable ways.

Diana J. Mason, PhD, RN, FAAN, Rudin Professor of Nursing

http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/news/news/nursing-future-workforce.shtml

The Institute of Medicine’s new report on