Connect with Healthcetera
Monday, April 29, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 54)

Michael DiBenedetto is a retired high school teach who grew up in the Catskill Mountains. Hunting was part of the culture and, for some families, an important source of food. When he got involved in tracking bald eagles and American eagles, he witnessed the effects of lead bullets on these birds of prey. When it enters a deer, the lead bullet splinters into minute particles that move throughout the deer. When birds of prey feed on the deer guts or carcasses, they can get severe lead poisoning that has a lasting effect on their brains and ability to hunt. He has witnessed lead-poisoned eagles be nurtured back to health, only to die because they no longer have the hunting instincts or brain function they need to find prey and survive.

So he became quite concerned when he was delivering food to a local food pantry in his community and discovered that they had venison in stock that hunters had graciously donated for use by needy families, including pregnant women and young children–those at highest risk for lead poisoning and its harmful effects. Some states require that such donations include an information sheet or label that alerts people to the fact that the venison may contain lead and that people should limit their intake of venison that has not be screened for lead. Other states actually require that venison be tested for lead before being donated to food pantries.

California has banned lead bullets because the lead poisoning was wiping out the condor population. But hunters and the National Rifle Association oppose such bans, despite the fact that there are alternative bullets that do not contain lead and are more accurate when fired.

I was dumbfounded when I spoke with Michael about the situation. In particular, I struggled to understand why a hunter would put his own family and friends at risk by using lead bullets and thus contaminating the venison that they ate. I am not opposed to responsible hunting and I love venison. But why would a hunter use lead bullets if they are toxic to wildlife and humans? The root of the problem seems related to why our country hasn’t banned assault weapons, even after multiple mass shootings with AR-15s and other semi-automatic weapons. It’s not about logic and the science. It’s about ideology.

I interviewed Michael DiBenedetto about the effects of lead bullets and what can be done to discourage their use. The interview aired recently on my radio program, HealthCetera in the Catkills, on WIOX Radio in Roxbury, NY. You can listen to it here:

Michael DiBenedetto is a retired high school

Graphic Medicine (www.graphicmedicine.org) is a growing field that encompasses the intersection of comics and health care. A leader in this nascent field is Dr. Monica Lalanda, an emergency room physician in Spain. Dr. Lalanda has integrated her comic-making and practice of medicine into her teaching of medical ethics. 

She also spearheaded the effort to create the Spanish-language version of the Graphic Medicine website, Medicina Gráfica, (https://medicinagrafica.com). You can learn more about Monica’s work, and her book Con-Ciencia Medica, on her website, https://monicalalanda.com. She tweets @mlalanda. She is interviewed here by nurse, cartoonist, and Senior Fellow MK Czerwiec, who also co-runs the Graphic Medicine website. (www.comicnurse.com) 

This month a special issue of the American Medical Association’s Journal of Ethics is devoted to ethical issues related to using comics in healthcare. Dr. Lalanda’s contributed to this article to the issue: http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2018/02/medu1-1802.html 

Also this month, an traveling exhibit and online Graphic Medicine resource center has been launched by the National Library of Medicine. Learn more about that exhibit here: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/graphicmedicine/index.html. 

You can listen to the podcast here:

Graphic Medicine (www.graphicmedicine.org) is a growing field that

“Persistently high poverty rates, poor educational outcomes, and weak social safety nets have made the United States the most dangerous of wealthy nations for a child to be born into.”

 

American children today face many challenges. When compared to other high income developed countries, the United States features poor maternal health, higher rates of premature births, and greater incidence of newborns with low birth weight. The health and educational outcomes of children who survive infancy are additionally concerning. Approximately 40 percent of the children who show up for kindergarten aren’t ready, 30 percent of young children have behavioral or developmental problems, and 22 percent of adolescents experience mental and behavioral health disorders that adversely affect school performance and/or participation in desired activities. Poverty, preventable accidents, and violence also contribute significant stressors that impact the current and future health development for many children in America. Evidence continues to support that early exposure to toxic stress gets “under the skin” and fosters lifelong adversity, yet advocacy efforts that promote investing in children continue to fail in both republican and democratic administrations.

 

Demographer Dowell Myers joins Healthcetera with an innovative perspective on the new importance of children in America. His research reframes the issue of the competing demands of child health versus an increasing population of aging Americans and adults with chronic illnesses. Myers debunks some of the common misperceptions about current demographic trends, unpacks his research findings, and highlights the future burdens that will fall upon the shoulders of the five year old children of today. As the baby boomer generation retires and the life expectancy of seniors continue to rise, the American workforce and number of babies being born is steadily falling. Tighter immigration policies also impact the shrinking American workforce due to the loss of children from immigrant parents .By 2030, Myers projects that there will be 42 seniors for every 100 Americans of working age (25-65 years old). Older Americans will have fewer people to help care for them and fewer taxpayers to support medicare and social security. These trends will eventually result in a critical shortage of economic and caregiving resources for the elderly.

 

Federal initiatives act as a blueprint and often guide priorities for health spending, health research, and health policy. Unfortunately, both Republican and Democrat Administrations share a history of under-prioritizing children. An analysis by the Urban Institute demonstrates that the 2018 budget proposed by the Trump administration reduces federal outlays by approximately 4.2 trillion dollars over the course of 10 years, and it reduces discretionary spending on children by 70 billion dollars. As discretionary funding undergoes annual appropriations, child involved programs such as social services and early childhood education are at risk of losing fiscal support. Additional projections include a 15 percent reduction in funding towards education programs, 10 percent decrease in health spending on children, a 9 percent decrease on programs involving child nutrition, a 3 percent decrease in spending on income security for households with children, and a decrease of 15 percent towards other child-involved residual spending. Compared with current spending under current law, the 2018 budget represents a 9 to 10 percent loss of federal spending towards children. This loss of funding for children at the federal level impacts spending in the state, local, and research arenas. While the majority of spending for health care, education, and income support are fueled by state and local policy, less federal dollars allocated to these programs will require states to make cuts and may hold serious implications for the health of our nation.

 

HealthCetera Producer Kristi Westphaln interviews demographer Dowell Myers on the new importance of children in America. His research reframes the issue of the competing demands of child health versus an increasing population of aging Americans and adults with chronic illnesses.

 

Listen to the podcast here:

"Persistently high poverty rates, poor educational outcomes,