Connect with Healthcetera
Friday, April 26, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 169)

kevin-1This is a guest post by Kevin McGirr, Associate Professor in the Nursing Department at New York City College of Technology. He holds degrees in public health and psychiatric nursing and has worked in public health and community mental health for the last four decades.  His interest is in advancing access to mental health services and the utilization of Harm Reduction and Motivational Interviewing in a wide variety of health problems. 

This past September, I completed my term as a Nehru-Fulbright Scholar at the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research Health Sciences campus in the south India city of Pondicherry.  It was a privilege to receive this scholarship and to engage with their faculty, professionals and students.

The campus is a large multi-service hospital with Colleges of Medicine, Nursing and a recently inaugurated School of Public Health. Due to my service and academic background, I had the opportunity to teach in all three schools.  I hold master’s degrees in public health and psychiatric nursing and I’ve completed course work for a doctoral degree in public health. 

To state that the experience has been interesting would be classic understatement.  As I had anticipated, I have probably learned more than I have taught.

India is soon to be come the most populous nation on the planet and currently holds a sixth of the world’s population.  It is a nation of significant diversity and contrasts in the way or religion, culture, language and class yet there is a national and cultural pride that is a very powerful glue.  It is growing in leaps in bounds.  It has the legacy of poverty and all that that implies with regard to health status but also has the dubious distinction of acquiring the Western propensity for “lifestyle” illnesses, e.g., illnesses that are attributed to various behaviors such as: diet, substance use and physical exercise.

My clinical background is mental health hence my tentacles were out seeking how the culture navigates and responds to mental health problems.  It is a significant challenge.  Estimates for the number of mental health professionals across India run as low as 10,000 for a population of 1.2 billion people; compare that to estimates of 550,000 for a U.S. population of 300 million. The need is staggering but at a more fundamental level, there is need to examine much deeper into how the culture conceptualizes and navigates emotional distress.

The documented rate of suicide varies with estimates as high as 16 per one hundred thousand.  Depending upon the data you consider, this is either higher or lower than the U.S. but what is clear that there is  a very poor system of reporting and conventional wisdom suggests that the Indian estimate is very conservative. A lot of attention has focused on the rural areas where farmers, due to emerging economic challenges have resorted to suicide in significant numbers.  A second group are students and young adults who are also turning to suicide to resolve feelings of perceived academic and occupational failure.

There is little in the way of prevention and community mental health services have barely been on the National Health radar screen.  There is a need for a lot of very basic data collection and research.  One effort in which this author has become involved is a qualitative research effort to investigate coping and help-seeking behavior related to suicide.  There is a significant list in the health area for growth and exploration; mental health is probably one of the biggest.

This is a guest post by Kevin McGirr,

Self-Health and Technology – consumer-driven health with technology is the focus of this 2-hour @centerhmp HealthStyles broadcast today from 3-5 PM ET WBAI-FM NY, 99.5; also live streamed at wbai.org  CHMP Senior Fellow Liz Seegert will be live-tweeting this segment using hashtag #Healthstyles

Co-host Barbara Glickstein interviews Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, health economist, advisor, co-founder at HealthcareDIY and blogger at THINK-HEALTH and HEALTH Populi and Andre Blackman leading analyst in sustainable health innovation design, founder of Pulse + Signal and co-founder of FastForward Health.  Follow Jane on Twitter @healthythinker and Andre @mindofandre @PulseAndSignal.  @FastFwdHealth

There’s an interview with co-founders of MakerNurse Anna Young and Jose Gomez-Marquez, research scientists at the Little Devices Lab @MIT.  What’s MakerNurse? “It’s when nurses have Apollo 13 moments” explained Jose Gomez-Marquez. Anna Young offered this insight “There are so many parallels to nurses working in completely different operating systems globally who are trying to solve problems with their hands inventing things to provide better care.” MakerNurse  is supported by the Robert Wood Johnson’s Pioneer Portfolio Project and The Institute for Medical Engineering and Science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Follow them on Twitter @makernurse

Whether you’re a techno-optimist and early adaptor of wearables, a follower of slow medicine or you’ve been left out of the conversation by choice or design  you’ll get up to speed listening to this broadcast. Or at least have an exciting peek into this world. It ain’t science fiction.

 

Self-Health and Technology - consumer-driven health with technology

ObamacareThe continued rancor about Obamacare among some interest groups could provide an opportunity to improve a landmark law through subsequent lawmaking that refines elements that aren’t working as well as expected.  Even people who are diehard supporters of Obamacare recognize that it doesn’t cover all people in the U.S. and that it falls short on things like negotiated pricing of pharmaceuticals. But analyzing the successes and shortcomings of existing laws requires unbiased data and whole truths.

When Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers gave the Republican  response to President Obama’s State of the Union address, she spoke about a woman from her state of Washington who reported that her insurance premium increased by $700 a month under Obamacare. New York Times columnist Paul Krugman writes today that this is misleading, at best. He links to a report by The Spokesman-Review, a local paper in the state of Washington, that interviewed Ms. Rodgers and discovered that she did not use the state health insurance exchange, even though it would have provided her with less expensive coverage.  “I wouldn’t go on that Obama website at all,” she is quoted as saying. In addition, her prior plan was a catastrophic coverage plan with a low premium and $10,000 deductible. Her current insurance coverage is more comprehensive and must include free well women care–one of the important elements of the Affordable Care Act.

The Republicans have finally put forth an alternative to Obamacare. The Patient Choice, Affordability, Responsibility and Empowerment (or Patient CARE) Act would repeal Obamacare and replace it with a plan that would increase access to affordable, high quality care “by empowering individuals and their families to make their own health care decisions, rather than empowering the government to make those decisions for them.”  In reality, it reduces the ACA’s restrictions on insurance companies being able to charge more for people with pre-existing conditions, allows states to opt out of requiring insurers to cover dependents up to 26 years of age, eliminates the individual mandate for insurance coverage (something that economists and others have argued is essential to reduce the overall cost of insurance by having the pool of ‘covered lives’ include healthy people who are low-end users of health care), changes Medicaid into a capped state allotment and have block grant programs for special populations (such as pregnant women and low income families), and other elements.

Are any of these ideas worth considering?  Many are incompatible with the ACA, but the proposal may include some measures worth exploring.  Unfortunately, when there is no space for honest, factual conversations about refining the law, the alternative to Obamacare can easily be viewed as a ruse to continue to oppose the most significant single piece of legislation in decades. The opposition would have more credibility if they insisted on using data and anecdotes that are true and undistorted.

Diana J. Mason, PhD, RN, FAAN, Rudin Professor of Nursing

The continued rancor about Obamacare among some