Connect with Healthcetera
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 109)

Graphic Illustration by MK Czerwiec

Graphic Illustration by MK Czerwiec

The media is like a finger on the pulse of our culture. Sometimes it reports on things happening on the edges, like coverage about death in America. 

Take media reports on living funerals where participants are asked to grapple with their own mortality over dinner; board games to spark participants to share their end-of-life wishes, death cafes, a death simulator that let’s you experience what cremation and rebirth might be like; and organic biodegradable burial pods buried under a tree you selected pre-death that become the source nutrients for the tree planted in a field. History informs us that some stuff sticks so I’m suggesting that it won’t be long before more of these lived experiences become common to our culture on death.

Are we experiencing a changing culture of how we die in America?

HealthCetera producer Liz Seegert’s radio segment reports on the the New York Academy of Medicine’s  Dying In America: Complex Choices  event sponsored by the Jonas Center for Nursing and Veteran Health held on May 5, 2016. Panelists included Amy Berman, RN, senior program officer at the John A. Hartford Foundation; Carolyn Jones, filmmaker;  Kenneth Prager, MD, professor of Clinical Medicine, director of Clinical Ethics and chairman of the Medical Ethics Committee, Columbia University Medical Center; and Judith Schwarz, RN, PhD, clinical director, End of Life Choices New York.  CHMP’s co-director, Barbara Glickstein was the moderator.

They shared insights from their personal struggles and professional experiences about one of the most difficult challenges facing caregivers, patients and health care professionals at the end-of-life.

MK Czerwiec, a.k.a. Comic Nurse, is a comic and graphic artist, who uses comics to reflect on the complexities of illness and caregiving. She attended this event and created the graphic facilitation posted above. Thank you MK!

This segment will air Thursday, June 9 at 1 PM on WBAI Pacifica Radio 99.5 FM and streamed live at wbai.org

You can listen to this segment now

[caption id="attachment_11355" align="aligncenter" width="580"] Graphic Illustration by

yael maxwellThis is the third of a 3 part look at the Heart Team by CHMP Media Fellow Yael Maxwell looking at the Heart Team in practice: what works, what doesn’t, and what the future may hold. This story originally appeared on TCTMD.com. Read part 1 here and part 2 here.

 

 

On the first Tuesday in March, several people sat facing each other in an eighth-floor conference room in one of Michigan’s highest volume cardiac centers. The sun had barely risen, its first rays inching through the east-facing window as if to help illuminate the discussion that had begun some 20 minutes earlier.

 

Of those present—advanced heart failure physicians, interventional cardiologists, noninvasive cardiologists, surgeons, an anesthesiologist, a physician assistant, a coordinator, and a nurse manager—about half were clad in scrubs, having already rounded on patients or prepped the cath lab for the day’s cases.

 

Each knew the weekly routine. They flipped through the binder in front of them and glanced at the echocardiograms and cardiac MRIs playing on a screen at the front of the room as Richard McNamara, MD, presented the third case of the morning.

 

A 68-year-old outpatient had been complaining of weakness and shortness of breath since eating a jalapeno dish on Super Bowl Sunday. It was originally thought he was having a heart attack. But after testing revealed a blood clot in the left descending coronary artery, the course of treatment became less clear.

 

Within 10 minutes, the group had decided on a course of action, and by 8:30 that morning, McNamara had communicated the plan to the patient.

 

creative commons lic.

creative commons lic.

Let’s Give It a Try

 

While the Heart Team concept evolved to bridge the often steel-walled siloes within the specialty, cardiologists, surgeons, and non-physician staff openly admit its use in practice is inconsistent and needs improvement. Some hospitals, however, have been creative in making it work for their practitioners and their patients.

 

For the team at Spectrum Health (Grand Rapids, MI), the management of their cardiac patients was not always so streamlined. Before the fall of 2014, “our process was very chaotic,” said McNamara, an interventional cardiologist who serves as co-director of Spectrum Health’s Heart Team.

 

“What tended to happen before is you’d have part of the conversation,” McNamara explained. “You’d say ‘What’s plan B?’ And we’d never have plan B very well worked out.”

 

Spectrum Health cardiothoracic surgeon and Heart Team co-director, Theodore J. Boeve, MD, said that cardiologists and surgeons “had more head butting before we had the Heart Team than we do now.”

 

McNamara originally spearheaded the effort to start Heart Team meetings at Spectrum out of pure frustration. That the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines lists the Heart Team as a “should do” process for trans catheter aortic valve replacement  (TAVR), helped to “put a little bit of structure and muscle behind it,” he said, but “we have always been absolutely dedicated to [excellent outcomes]. Once we had identified this as a problem . . . we said, ‘This looks like a potential solution. Let’s give it a try.’”

 

At first, meetings were held monthly. Practitioners submitted their cases to McNamara for presentation. Someone recorded minutes. But many of the cardiologists and surgeons who were most wanted didn’t show up, explained David Wohns, MD, director of Spectrum Health’s catheterization, or cath lab.

 

“We had a lot of skepticism about its value,” said Wohns, Finding a time that worked for everyone was the hardest logistical issue, since surgeons start doing rounds on patients earlier than the cardiologists do. They eventually settled on 6:45 am.

yael maxwellThis is the third of a 3 part look at the Heart Team by CHMP Media Fellow Yael Maxwell looking at the Heart Team in practice: what works, what doesn’t, and what the future may hold. This story originally appeared on TCTMD.com. Read part 1 here and part 2 here.

 

 

On the first Tuesday in March, several people sat facing each other in an eighth-floor conference room in one of Michigan’s highest volume cardiac centers. The sun had barely risen, its first rays inching through the east-facing window as if to help illuminate the discussion that had begun some 20 minutes earlier.

 

Of those present—advanced heart failure physicians, interventional cardiologists, noninvasive cardiologists, surgeons, an anesthesiologist, a physician assistant, a coordinator, and a nurse manager—about half were clad in scrubs, having already rounded on patients or prepped the cath lab for the day’s cases.

 

Each knew the weekly routine. They flipped through the binder in front of them and glanced at the echocardiograms and cardiac MRIs playing on a screen at the front of the room as Richard McNamara, MD, presented the third case of the morning.

 

A 68-year-old outpatient had been complaining of weakness and shortness of breath since eating a jalapeno dish on Super Bowl Sunday. It was originally thought he was having a heart attack. But after testing revealed a blood clot in the left descending coronary artery, the course of treatment became less clear.

 

Within 10 minutes, the group had decided on a course of action, and by 8:30 that morning, McNamara had communicated the plan to the patient.

 

creative commons lic.

creative commons lic.

Let’s Give It a Try

 

While the Heart Team concept evolved to bridge the often steel-walled siloes within the specialty, cardiologists, surgeons, and non-physician staff openly admit its use in practice is inconsistent and needs improvement. Some hospitals, however, have been creative in making it work for their practitioners and their patients.

 

For the team at Spectrum Health (Grand Rapids, MI), the management of their cardiac patients was not always so streamlined. Before the fall of 2014, “our process was very chaotic,” said McNamara, an interventional cardiologist who serves as co-director of Spectrum Health’s Heart Team.

 

“What tended to happen before is you’d have part of the conversation,” McNamara explained. “You’d say ‘What’s plan B?’ And we’d never have plan B very well worked out.”

 

Spectrum Health cardiothoracic surgeon and Heart Team co-director, Theodore J. Boeve, MD, said that cardiologists and surgeons “had more head butting before we had the Heart Team than we do now.”

 

McNamara originally spearheaded the effort to start Heart Team meetings at Spectrum out of pure frustration. That the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines lists the Heart Team as a “should do” process for trans catheter aortic valve replacement  (TAVR), helped to “put a little bit of structure and muscle behind it,” he said, but “we have always been absolutely dedicated to [excellent outcomes]. Once we had identified this as a problem . . . we said, ‘This looks like a potential solution. Let’s give it a try.’”

 

At first, meetings were held monthly. Practitioners submitted their cases to McNamara for presentation. Someone recorded minutes. But many of the cardiologists and surgeons who were most wanted didn’t show up, explained David Wohns, MD, director of Spectrum Health’s catheterization, or cath lab.

 

“We had a lot of skepticism about its value,” said Wohns, Finding a time that worked for everyone was the hardest logistical issue, since surgeons start doing rounds on patients earlier than the cardiologists do. They eventually settled on 6:45 am.

This post was first published on The New York Academy of Medicine’s Urban Health Matters Blog on Monday, May 2, 2016 and is reposted here with permission from the NYAM. 

 

 

Barbara Glickstein is co-director of The Center for Health, Media & Policy at Hunter College City University of New York and a member of the Academy Fellows Section on Nursing.

 

2012-10-22_18-08-10_28

 

Spending intimate time with people who are dying, and their families or caregivers, is part of being a registered nurse. All too often, a nurse‘s clinical expertise and heightened intuition informs them of a shared truth at a critical time—they, and their patients, often know when death is not far away. But the word “death“ is never uttered.

In those moments, nurses often stand silent and morally conflicted as an all-too-familiar scenario unfolds. An attending physician offers the patient and family another treatment option. The first two failed miserably. The nurse silently wonders, “This  person is dying—why isn’t the option of calling in palliative care being discussed?“ The patient looks to their loved ones for an answer. They say “yes“ to the physician, please go ahead and schedule the treatment as soon as possible. [continue reading here]

This post was first published on The