Connect with Healthcetera
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 181)

This guest post is by Lynn Robinson, an RN and a student at the Hunter–Bellevue School of Nursing. In 2012 Lynn took a course in narrative writing for nursing students at Hunter taught by CHMP senior fellows Joy Jacobson and Jim Stubenrauch.

It’s almost midnight, five hours into my 12-hour nursing shift, but the lobby’s still buzzing with excitement. I’m greeted by whiffs of strong coffee every time I pass the nurse’s station. The little old lady in the room by the nurse’s station is complaining that her temporary roommate won’t turn down the volume of the television, while the young, strapping lad in the room at the end of the hall is limping across the floor pleading for more pain medication. I feel the pressure building up behind my eyes. I take a minute to run to the bathroom to wash the sleep off of my face. Just a few hours more and the unsightly dark circles will begin to form around my eyes. Ah, burning the midnight oil on the night shift!

Lynn Robinson

Lynn Robinson

Nursing is a 24-hour-a-day business—the availability of round-the-clock health care is a hallmark of our modern society. Some nurses take on the lengthy 12-hour day shifts, while others opt to work late evenings and nights when most people are watching Modern Family or Once Upon A Time in Wonderland just before their bedtime. Working the night shift has been found to be associated with an increased risk of a number of health complications including sleep disorders, obesity, heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, reproduction irregularities, infections, as well as familial and social life disturbances. Lengthy shifts, in general, have been found to cause similar problems. Take a look here at this literature review from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, which examines research reports that studied the links between long working hours and performance, employee health, and safety complications.

Nurses are no strangers to stressful shift-work schedules. The job postings for nursing jobs advertise the attractive differential in pay for taking a night-shift position. Sure the night shift pays more, but can you put a price on your health? Studies have linked obesity in nurses to job stress and long work hours. Check this study out here, which found that 55% of nurses are overweight or obese. Obesity in nurses is getting much-needed attention. Take a look at a press release about this study from the University of Maryland.

I’ve found the night shift to be particularly challenging. Sleep is a big factor in our health. Some nights I imagine leading a call-and-response chant with my coworkers.

What do we want? Sleep!
When do we want it? All the time! Basically.

Our bodies prefer to be active during the day and to rest at night. Being awake at night interrupts our circadian rhythm, or body clock. Our body clock sits inside our brains, running the show—it’s responsible for our sleep-wake cycles, temperature, metabolism, hormones, and reproductive system. Tick-tock!

With enough sleep, my body is a well-oiled machine. But when’s the last time I got eight hours of uninterrupted sleep? Maybe a year and 10 pounds ago, before I started working the night shift. Nobody really respects daytime sleepers. Your kids more than likely won’t. Neither will the heavy-duty truck horns, the UPS deliveryman, or the 15 errands on your to-do list.

Unhealthy habits are also to blame.

Quick question! What time’s lunch time when you’re on the night shift? Maybe 2 am. Some may argue 4 am. But, where’s the kitchen staff that serves all those healthy food options to the day-shift clan? They were already gone by the time my belly grumbled for “lunch.” Sure enough, there was also no time for home-cooked meals, so I opted for delivery. A chicken-and-steak burrito, served on a fresh 12-inch tortilla, with rice, beans, lettuce, ripe tomatoes, and cheese, minus any remnants of guacamole, became “the usual.” Potato chips or candy bars were also popular choices from the vending machines that lined the hallway outside the cafeteria. As you could imagine, finding time for much exercise also became more difficult.

It’s surprising to me that anyone is still willing to work the night shift. But I think there’s hope. Employers need to get involved in addressing these health issues. Making schedules that allow nurses to get enough rest needs to become a top priority. They can also put wellness programs in place to help encourage healthier lifestyles. I’m talking about offering on-site gyms, or discounts and reimbursement for off-site health club fees, or weight management programs. How about addressing that cafeteria? During the day, healthy selections of food and drinks are available for employees. Night-shift workers aren’t always this lucky. Putting healthier options in the vending machines may be a good start. No more candy bars, potato chips, and sweet drinks. Maybe nuts, low-fat pretzels, baked chips, diet sodas, and water might be better choices!

A lesson in irony? I lost sleep to finish this blog post. I’m not worried about that just yet, since America likes her nurses like nurses like their coffee—strong.

This guest post is by Lynn Robinson,

Barbara Glickstein is the co-director of the Center for Health, Media & Policy and has been reporting on human trafficking for the past 6 years.

imgres-2

“There is no such things as a child prostitute”

This was just one of the straightforward facts made by Minh Dang to reporters (including this reporter) attending the McCormick Institute on Reporting on Sex Trafficking: A Local Problem with Global Dimensions this past October.

The institute was sponsored by the Robert R. McCormick Foundation and The Irina Project (TIP) at the University of North Carolina School of Journalism and Mass Communication. 194a5dcaf266bf618514162a0dbfa1b2_bigger

The Irina Project (TIP), co-directed by  Dr. Barbara Friedman and Dr. Anne Johnston, monitors media representations of sex trafficking and advocates for the responsible and accurate reporting of sex trafficking.

Drs. Friedman and Johnston presented their research looking at 5 years of international and national media coverage on sex trafficking. Their research identified patterns framing the issue including the use of language. They found that the label prostitute or hooker was most frequently used by reporters to describe the persons involved.

Under federal law, children cannot consent to being a prostitute and a child does not need to be moved across international or even state borders to be considered a victim of commercial sexual exploitation. In the United States, a minor is defined as someone under the age of 18.

A recent headline in the Washington Post, “D.C. police search home of officer in investigation of prostitution ring” reports locating a 16 year old female who was reported missing in his apartment. The article states, “The teenager told police that the officer took nude photos of her and arranged for her to have sex for money, the court papers say.”

Kudos to these reporters for using plain language – this girl was found here and here’s what she was experiencing.

Journalists struggle with reporting on sex trafficking and how to better frame the stories.  There was significant time dedicated to addressing the lack of reliable data on the issue and how to work with that limitation.

But that’s not all.

In several sessions we heard directly from women survivors on what it was like being interviewed by journalists – not all good. One suggested that we “stay in our lane” and “to be human”.

Here’s one critical take-away – we must all confront our own assumptions about sex trafficking.

The reporters in attendance made a promise – we’d never use the words child prostitute in a story on sex trafficking.

Because there is no such thing as a child prostitute.

Barbara Glickstein is the co-director of the

Amanda Anderson, RN, BSN is a Center for Health, Media & Policy Graduate Fellow.

rivergretareflection

A recent update from the Kaiser Family Foundation brought fresh news of Florida’s health care landscape; a land far from our chilly New York temperatures, but close to my heart just the same. Florida, you see, is where my 95-year-old grandmother goes to escape harsh Buffalo winters. This year, after selling our upstate childhood home in a quest for change, my parents are also spending the winter in the sun, living with my grandmother and her husband. In their transition, mom and dad are helping Far Mor, the woman I’ve always known by this Swedish nickname; she is growing frail, and we’re all wondering if this will be her last season in the sunshine state.

Last week, my mother told me that she took the nonagenarians to the Area Agency on Aging (AAA), because, “Far Mor got a letter in the mail, and her insurance will go from zero dollars a month to four hundred with Obamacare.” My reading told me that Florida is one of the most hostile states towards the Affordable Care Act, limiting Medicaid expansion and refusing a state-run health exchange, but I knew that this shouldn’t affect my grandmother, exempt from the exchanges as a long-time Medicare recipient. So, with the December 7th open enrollment deadline quickly approaching, I thought I’d check in to see what was up.

My grandmother, a feisty little Swede, has been fortunate. With few health problems – a longstanding hearing deficit and some stubborn high cholesterol – she’s fared well on her recipe for longevity of vitamins, hard work and genetics, until last year, when she suffered a stroke that landed her in the hospital. More than $27,000 and a fistful of prescriptions later, she became conscious of the part her otherwise silent health insurance – Medicare Advantage – played.

“My bill was just one thousand dollars,” she said of her lengthy hospitalization last Christmas. Now, she tells her main concern: the money she is afraid she’ll have to pay for health insurance since WellCare, her current provider of Medicare Advantage, is consolidating her longstanding plan in preparation for January’s changes and costs, like many providers around the country. “I was soaring on cloud nine, no bills at all, for years and years,” she said, unaware that her $96 premium was taken directly from her social security check all along.

With this shakeup, she worries about the cost of a new prescription that would replace the Coumadin that she begrudgingly takes. She is a funny noncompliant patient, eating too many greens and vegetables that make her INR level (a blood test that measures how fast the blood clots) bounce inconsistently, like rain on the roof. With her blood-thinning medicine, she’ll be able to eat whatever she wants, but she feels troubled by the nuisance of having to pick another plan, especially with this new drug in her regimen.  Why change anything at all, when Medicare Advantage worked so well for so long? “I blame our president, of course,” Far Mor says, with Fox News blaring in the background.

Her confusion doesn’t seem to be a rarity amongst seniors. With the whirlwind of the health exchanges taking up the majority of media coverage, it’s easy to see how a routine yearly requirement – to stay or change Medicare plans – might lead to confusion in a population privy to consistency. I have seen my grandmother hunched over her dining room table amongst piles of bills, balancing her checkbook many times, but never perusing a download, or filtering Google search results. New terminology, dates, technology; some Medicare plans are even using the “gold” and “silver” of the ACA marketplace, adding to the complexity.

Talking to my mother is another story. A woman well versed in the intricacies of health insurance plans, learned from years spent maneuvering the policies of a four-child family, it is fortunate that she is there for her mother-in-law . “She couldn’t hear, and he forgets,” she says of their time with the volunteer at the AAA. Speaking of the complexity of reviewing and understanding the available plans on medicare.gov, my mother doesn’t know how my grandmother would have fared without her help. “Think of all the people who have no one to do this for them,” comes as a stark statement in a state where the government forbade federally funded navigators from entering state-run facilities.

A deeper look into the organization where my parents and grandparents sought assistance brings hope. The program that they received counsel from, called SHINE – Serving the Health Insurance Needs of Elders – is run by volunteers who provide unbiased counsel for elders needing to know their options with the changing market. My grandmother, perfectly happy on Medicare Advantage with WellCare, was told she’d be changed to a Medicare Original plan when her policy is eliminated this January. This plan, explained to her as the default plan, sports high out of pocket expense caps – a fact she had no idea, or understanding of – and could have landed her in a load of debt if she had fallen ill.

After reviewing the options, my mother says they will likely choose the HMO that Humana offers. With this, her cost will change marginally, but the great expense that my grandmother has incurred is that of education. Likening the process, which included a home visit from a Humana representative, to a “fire hydrant of information,” my mother reported that Far Mor felt overwhelmed by the change, although grateful that her new plan covers the Pradaxa, allowing her to eat as many greens as she likes.

“Only death and taxes do not change,” she laughed, a phrase I’ve heard her say many times before. This time, though, she sounded weary, as though the process and my questions tired her. I am so glad that my parents are there to shepherd her through this decision so that she can get the care she needs – and wants – for her final years. But what if they weren’t?   written by Amanda Anderson, RN, BSN

Amanda Anderson, RN, BSN is a Center