Connect with Healthcetera
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 186)

This is repost from Reporting On Health, the blog of the California Endowment Health Journalism Fellowship and written by Martha Rosenberg.

Martha Rosenberg

Martha Rosenberg

 

Imagine lawmakers allowing lead to remain in gasoline because of the oil and gas lobby.

Imagine them allowing secondhand smoke in public places because of the tobacco lobby.

Imagine lawmakers allowing unvetted people to train in the US as pilots because of the flight school lobby. Imagine them allowing people to board planes with box cutters because of the hand tool lobby.

Pretty ridiculous except that’s exactly why we have the parade of bloody AR-15 massacres–the gun lobby. The most recent being two days ago at LAX where a TSA officer was murdered.

Why don’t the pols who consistently defeat assault weapon bans, improved background checks, ammunition control and laws against gun trafficking, crooked dealers and straw buyers, tell their constituents the truth–hey, we’re sorry some of you are getting killed out there but we are afraid of the NRA.

 Constituents would then realize the gun lobby is just like the Mafia in the 1950’s which was also tolerated by politicians because of personal investment, threat of retaliation, extortion and political pressure. It was stronger than the government itself. In the 1960’s, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy reversed the mob’s historical terrorism by getting laws passed which restrain the black hand of the Mafia to this day. (continue reading here).

This is repost from Reporting On Health,

This is a guest post by Seren Wechsler, who is a graduate student of nutrition at the CUNY School of Public Health.  Having successfully defeated a decade long bout of morbid obesity during his first year of film school, he had no choice but to drop out, go to Israel to farm for a bit, then return to New York for an education in nutritional science.  Seren’s personal experiences drew him into public health but the transformations our food system and environment are currently going through will keep him here. 

photocredit:Foodylife.com

photocredit:Foodylife.com

GMOs (genetically modified organisms) are something everyone has at least heard about.  Unfortunately, hearing about something like GMOs is often associated with hearing someone’s opinion about GMOs.  Myths flourish; that’s what they do, they’ll never stop.  Genetically modified food however, is something we really need to be accurate about.

Whenever a new product is created that’s intended for human consumption, and we end up buying that product in a store, we buy it thinking it’s safe.  One of the inherent reasons behind why we assume a product is safe is because we assume the workers at the factory, the minds behind the creation, know what they’re doing.  One very important myth about GMOs that desperately needs correcting is that genetic modification (the process of manipulating a cell’s DNA, either by inserting a segment from another, usually unrelated species, or by adding wholly artificial properties like insecticide producing corn) is precise.  Precision equals ‘workers knowing what they’re doing’ and so, this myth also likely serves as the single common forethought for anyone believing in the safety of GMOs; it’s only logical.

The first step in the process, the cutting/splicing of genes, is indeed precise.  Every step afterward though, is completely the opposite.  The theory behind the practice is that a single change in DNA will bring about a single consequence.  This thinking truly does conflict with everything genetics has taught us.  One need only to look at their health effects for evidence, such as the study published in The Food and Chemical Toxicology Journal which found that rats developed massive tumors and widespread organ damage after being fed GM corn and trace amount of the chemical fertilizer, Roundup or the study on pigs fed GM corn and soy.  A 267% increase in severe stomach inflammation compared to controls was observed and because, among the males, a 400% increase was observed, health professionals are now investigating possible connections GMO consumption has with autism (most autistic children are male and nearly all have severe intestinal inflammation).

What our bodies are literally composed of is a direct result of the foods we eat.  Among all the GMO research, the demographic studied least is humans.  If the non-human animal experiments show these types of results, we must now look to ourselves.  Until evidence that conclusively proves otherwise, please, err on the side of caution.

Written by Seren Wechsler

This is a guest post by Seren

Joy Jacobson is the CHMP’s poet-in-residence. Follow her on Twitter: @joyjaco.

good nurseI have an odd confession. When I was the managing editor of the American Journal of Nursing for most of the 2000s, I kept a log of criminal nurses. I’m not entirely sure why; perhaps the nursing profession’s perennial lead in Gallup’s “honesty and ethics” poll made me want to explore its underbelly. Through periodic web searches I found more than a few “angels of death,” nurses who purported to end their patients’ suffering by murdering them with high doses of morphine or other drugs. I found rapists, thieves, addicts, pedophiles. But nothing ever matched the terrifying 16-year spree of critical care nurse and serial killer Charles Cullen.

Journalist Charles Graeber has written an engrossing book about Cullen, The Good Nurse: A True Story of Medicine, Madness and Murder. Graeber will be at Roosevelt House in New York (47-49 E 65th St., between Park and Madison Avenues) this Thursday at 6 PM, talking with health care journalist Charles Ornstein and nurse attorney Edie Brous about Cullen’s pattern of killing in various New Jersey and Pennsylvania hospitals. Hospitals, Bad Practitioners, and Accountability: Lessons from the Case of Serial Killer Charles Cullen is free and open to the public. RSVP at centerhealthmediapolicy@gmail.com.

I found Graeber’s narrative style to be deeply affecting. Here he is describing one of Cullen’s earliest victims, the Rev. Florian Gall:

Charlie would study the man at night, his bald head glowing in the light of the machines, his clerical vestments exchanged for a disposable frock. He looked nothing like the priests of Charlie’s youth, nothing like God’s man on earth—he looked sick, and very human. That was his prognosis. Charlie knew the charts, he’d pulled the little computer cart to the corner of the Cardiac Care Unit to pore through the drama of numbers.

Rev. Florian Gall coded at approximately 9:32 AM the morning of June 28. He went unexpectedly into cardiac arrest, and heroic measures were undertaken. They were unsuccessful. His time of death was noted in his chart: 10:10 AM. Gall’s bloodwork showed that his digoxin levels were off the charts.

The Somerset Medical Center administration had a problem. It was not a natural death. And Gall wasn’t the first. They called him “Patient 4.”

Cullen himself knew that the hospitals that employed him permitted his long career as a killer. In a 60 Minutes segment (online in two parts: here and here) on Graeber’s book and the investigation that ended in Cullen’s confession in 2003, Steve Kroft asked Cullen: How could he have been passed off from one hospital to the next, receiving good or neutral references? Why did no one go to the police when it became obvious that Cullen was implicated in patient deaths? Cullen blinked as though blinded by the sun: “I think because it’s a matter of worrying about lawsuits. If they pointed out here was a problem they would be liable for millions of dollars.”

Having spent seven years investigating the case, and interviewing Cullen a dozen times, Graeber chose to tell the story as a story, one in which on every page I came face to face with what was at stake for so many. (Cullen admitted to having murdered as many as 40 patients, but Graeber estimates the number may be 10 times that.) Graeber painstakingly reveals his sources but only in his endnotes, thus allowing the reader to feel the impact of Cullen’s choices, patient after patient, as well as the legalistic horrors that allowed him to continue to practice and the heroic efforts of Cullen’s fellow nurse, Amy Loughren, who finally urged him to confess. As one reviewer put it, “Graeber has accomplished something remarkable: he’s allowed himself the freedom to construct the main narrative for maximum impact while never jeopardizing our trust.”

I hope you’ll participate in what should be a fascinating conversation.

Joy Jacobson is the CHMP’s poet-in-residence. Follow