HealthCetera has rolled out it's News Action
This serves as the inaugural edition of HealthCetera’s global health policy and media action news update curated by the Center’s Katherine (Kayte) Green. This bi-weekly round-up intends to keep our community appraised of up-to-date news, policies, and ideas important to policy and social issues facing national and international health. This selection gathers information from a wide range of sources including, but not limited to: health associations and organizations, news sources, government agencies, academic publications, policy centers, and other national and international experts.
U.S. Gun Control Reform
Gun control is a serious health risk problem affecting the United States. Gun violence and the increase in school mass shootings has become a part of the American landscape. The latest mass school shooting in Santa Fe, Texas, illustrates the grave consequences of a lenient gun legislative system and unjust penal system. The Santa Fe, Texas, shooting has become another tragic example of the laissez-faire regulations surrounding gun control in America. More than ever, there is a heightened need for evidence-based and cross-sectional solutions to this systemic problem. The following contemporaneous readings and call-to-actions give a brief glimpse on how American academics, policy makers, journalists, and healthcare providers and researchers are weighing in on gun violence.
Responses:
Trump-Pence Administration Gag Rule on Title X
The Trump-Pence Administration has placed a domestic “gag” rule on Title X – also known as one of the nation’s primary birth control and reproductive health care programs. Revising a “Regan like-era rule” will defund family planning organizations such as Planned Parenthood, and other lesser known family planning organizations, because they will not meet the qualifications for federal funds since they offer family planning options that include services such as abortion or abortion referrals. This mandate has far reaching national and international health implications that are yet to be determined, but could have devastating repercussions.
Responses:
Related Reports:
The National Academy of Medicine: The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States
World Health Organization 71st Assembly
Health Ministers and representatives from many organizations working to improve health gathered in Geneva last week, May 21st – 25th for the 71st World Health Assembly. On May 23rd, delegates agreed on WHO’s new strategic plan of work for the next five years that sets three targets to ensure that by 2023, “ 1 billion more people benefit from universal health coverage; 1 billion more people are better protected from health emergencies; and 1 billion more people enjoy better health and wellbeing. WHO estimates that achieving this “triple billion” target could save 29 million lives.” – World Health Organization
The closing remarks and summary of the 71st WHO Assembly are documented here.
Other issues for discussion include influenza, cholera, tuberculosis, snakebite, physical activity, polio and access to essential medicines.
Responses:
Ebola Outbreak 2018
The global health community braces itself for the resurgence of Ebola, with an outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) last month. Ebola is endemic to Congo, and this is its ninth outbreak of Ebola virus disease since the discovery of the virus near the country’s Ebola River. As reported by the World Health Organization on May 30th, 2018, there has been 54 Ebola virus disease cases including 25 deaths in the DRC to date. The Ebola outbreak between 2014 and 2016 in West African (Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia) was the largest, deadliest, and most complex on record since the virus was discovered in 1976. It is too early to determine the breadth and outcomes of this outbreak, but there is an alignment with global health experts that the world needs to prepare to act quickly to fight this outbreak.
Responses:
Global Health News Resources:
(Unsponsored and unsolicited)
The New York Times: Trying To Put A Value On The Doctor-patient Relationship
Katherine Green works for the George Washington School of Nursing’s Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement. She holds a Master’s Degree in International Relations and Service Development. The focus of her research is gender equity and empowerment. She is passionate about working on unresolved social issues that deal with health, gender rights, LGBTQ, risk reduction, the arts, and justice. She has a background in social sciences and fine arts. Prior to joining GW, Katherine has worked in global and national health advocacy, development, and policy.
To subscribe and submit content to HealthCetera News Action Update email: nursingpolicy@gwu.edu
This serves as the inaugural edition of
This post was first published May 24th on The Relentless School Nurse. It is reposted here with permission by the The Relentless School Nurse and author, Robin Cogan, MEd, RN, NCSN.
There was a recent review of a seminal study of nurses used as expert sources by journalists called “Woodhull Study Revisited.” The original study was completed in 1998 by Nancy Woodhull, the founding editor of USA Today. Ms. Woodhull was both curious and concerned about what she believed was the under-representation of women in all media, including nurses. The extensive study uncovered some very disturbing data, including that only 4 percent of health-related news articles utilized nurses as a source, even if the article pertained to nursing or included photos of nurses (Mason, Glickstein 2018).
The study was replicated 20 years later in 2018 and the findings were shared in a press conference presented by Diana Mason and Barbara Glickstein the nurse founders of the Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement of the George Washington University School of Nursing. I am frustrated to report that the latest findings were equally abysmal with little-to-no improvement in giving voice to nurses as sources for health-related media stories. Woodhull Study Revisited details the findings and raises thought-provoking questions about the role of bias at the intersection of nursing and journalism.
One of the more alarming findings of the study was: “[W]hen used as sources, it most often was in stories about labor, the profession itself (such as the scope of practice), quality or education. Nurses seldom were included in stories on research (9 percent), policy (4 percent), or business (3 percent).” Nursing practice is steeped in research to inform our evidence-based practice, but with whom are we sharing our findings? It seems that we are reporting within our own organizations, journals, and practice specialties, but not outside of the “walls” of our own self-contained silos.
I am equally complicit and here is a perfect example of a missed media opportunity. March 16-17, 2018 was the New Jersey State School Nurses (NJSSNA) annual spring conference. I was the co-chair of the event that drew 400 NJ school nurses, 2 nationally known keynote speakers, 21 breakout sessions, 8 poster presentations and 0 news media. It never even dawned on me to alert the media until I watched the Woodhull Study Revisited press conference! What a missed opportunity to promote the work of school nursing! I realized after reading the Woodhull findings that I had a deficit of nursing knowledge related to media competencies. I began to review the other “missed opportunities” where I did not reach out to the media or pitch a great school nurse story to highlight our work and truthfully, it made me angry but activated! Read the rest of the article here.
This post was first published May 24th