Connect with Healthcetera
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 67)

 

As Congress is poised to pass the tax bill without an economic analysis by the Congressional Budget Office or public hearings, questions have arisen regarding what’s in the bill. Because the House and Senate versions of the bill differed, a Conference Committee has developed a negotiated version that they believe both Houses will support. But most Congressional members will not see this bill until today and will be expected to vote on it next week. One question is whether the final bill contains language that can  be used to restrict women’s right to abortion.

The House bill had provisions for including unborn children as beneficiaries in 529 Plans for college savings, which some have noted to be a strategy for establishing “personhood” for fetuses. While some have disputed this claim, Snopes confirmed it as mostly true, noting: “Because the language included in the GOP’s 2017 tax overhaul legislation does not explicitly state a goal of creating legal precedent or fetal personhood, but because it implicitly does this through otherwise unnecessary regulation, we rate the claim that “fetal personhood” language is included in the 2017 GOP tax plan as mostly true.

There is a growing concern among some sectors of our country that women’s access to reproductive health services is under assault at the federal level through actions proposed or taken by the Trump Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services, as well as by Congress. The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, strengthened women’s access to reproductive health services in a number of ways, including by expanding health insurance coverage and providing many women with access to no-cost birth control. Indeed, it was the first law to set minimum coverage requirements for women’s reproductive health services and birth control across all health plans. As a result, the number of women paying for contraceptives fell from nearly 21 percent in 2012 to fewer than 4 percent by 2014, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. As a result, both birth and abortion rates have declined, underscoring the importance of women’s access to financially affordable, reliable contraception.

The ACA did build in exceptions for religious organizations, but the Supreme Court expanded the exceptions to any business formed as “closely held corporation” that objected to providing contraception coverage on religious grounds in the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby.

On October 6, 2017, under the title of “Executive Order Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty,” the Trump Administration issued new roles expanding the Hobby Lobby exceptions to any employer who has a religious or moral objection to providing birth control coverage.

In addition, continuing attempts by Congress and the Administration to undermine the ACA have the potential to reduce access to health coverage through the state and federal health insurance exchanges and the expansion of Medicaid–and thus to reduce women’s access to reproductive services and treatments. Poor women need assistance with paying for birth control. Have you priced a box of condoms lately? The threat of capping or cutting or block-granting Medicaid is a real threat to women’s access to affordable birth control.

These federal actions speak to the vulnerability of women who seek to control their reproductive lives. But women in some states will be protected from these attacks on women’s access to reproductive services and birth control.

On October 25th on HealthCetera in the Catskills on WIOX Radio, I interviewed two guests about the protections that New York State provides women to ensure that they still have access to reproductive services. Debra Marcus, the Chief Executive Officer of Family Planning of South Central New York, and Lisa David, CEO and President of Public Health Solutions, joined me in this discussion. [For the purposes of transparency, I’m a member of the board of directors of Public Health Solutions.] The conversation provides examples of how other states can act to protect women’s reproductive rights. You can listen to the program here:

  As Congress is poised to pass the

On November 9 the National Academy of Medicine unveiled its Visualize Health Equity Project, an online gallery of 40 visual and verbal artworks. Artists from around the country submitted works illustrating what health equity means to them, expressing the opportunities and challenges surrounding the health of their communities.

The gallery demonstrates an impressive diversity of imagination that gives me hope for humans.

I’m happy to say that my prose poem “Health Equity as a Stand of Quaking Aspen: Sangre de Cristo Mountains” is among those on display. Even though I live in Brooklyn, my poetry is centered in the U.S. Southwest, where the great paradoxes of endangerment and beauty, brutality and tenderness are displayed in its many damaged ecosystems and in its high rates of health disparities.

I wrote in a brief essay accompanying my poem:

“New Mexico is a bellwether of how changes in climate, agriculture, and regulation affect public health, as well as the recovery possible through strategies designed to improve care access for Native residents and to restore aspen to mountainsides they’ve inhabited for millennia.

Aspen clones act as a living symbol of communal strength in biodiversity. But they’re more than metaphors: their health and ours are inseparable.”

Such ideas aren’t new, and poetry has deep ties to both environmentalism and social justice. But it’s a prose writer I think of as the poet laureate of 20th-century American conservation. Aldo Leopold’s rhythms and eloquence made clear what human greed had already imperiled by 1910, and in his prose he adopted two of poetry’s oldest traditions, the pastoral and the elegy, in crafting his argument for a “land ethic”—a philosophy in which any definition of community must also include nonhuman life.

Phrase by phrase and species by species, Leopold made his poetic case for “interdependence.”

By the turn of the 21st century, poets began using terms such as ecopoetry, ecocriticism, and ecopoetics to define how they would grapple with environmental crisis. They asked: How might the entire poetic enterprise—the composition, publication, reading, and performance of poems—inform an environmental ethic? Melissa Tuckey uses the term ecojustice poetry to describe poetry “at the intersection of culture, social justice, and the environment,” a poetry “of interconnection.”

I’m seeing more and more interconnections in contemporary poems between health disparities and ecological disaster. Of the many poets illuminating such issues, I’d like to point to one whose work provides a very moving example of lyric possibility.

William Brewer’s first full-length collection of poems, I Know Your Kind, reveals the opioid crisis as an outgrowth of the environmental and economic devastation afflicting his native West Virginia, the state with the highest death rate from opiate overdose.

Brewer conjures a world we can’t turn away from. “Like timber, like anthracite, death is a natural resource,” Brewer writes in “West Virginia.” These poems break and mourn and collapse; they brave the muted stillness remaining after tragic death; and ultimately they risk the claim that these hidden lives and that blasted landscape merit saving.

In “In the Room of the Overdosed, an Ember” the speaker addresses the body of a departed friend:

“You are still here. Each second of late-winter dark is a feather stitching the wings of your ghost.
The coal is almost gone, and soon the mountain tops, and fresh water, after which
this will be the cellar of how many centuries, locked away?
Snow wrapping the hills like caul fat.
Cattle on the hills, drops of soot.
The sky is blind and open for the snow.”

Blind and open . . . Isn’t that sky like so many us, our human eyes open but not seeing? Isn’t that how we’ve responded, as a culture, to the opioid epidemic, to health disparities overall, and to our changing climate?

Leopold wrote that the poet’s motivation is “the thrill to beauty.” Brewer’s work and the Visualize Health Equity Project are important efforts in helping us recognize the beauty and connections that endure in the midst of ruin. Policymakers will do well to study these and other artworks as they strategize to avert catastrophe.

On November 9 the National Academy of

Since WWII, Americans have been sold the idea that more health care is better. But comparisons of the U.S. with other comparable nations teach us otherwise. While we spend more per person on health care than any other nation—a total of over $3 trillion per year—we rank last or next to the last in key indicators of health and quality of health care. We know that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in this country, evidence that our health care system is not safe. And we are overscreening and overtreating and mistreating and misdiagnosing health problems. About one-third of all healthcare spending is because of unnecessary, inefficient and ineffective care, as well as outright fraud. If we could reduce this waste and give it to communities to promote health and wellness, we wouldn’t need as much acute care.

There is a growing movement in the U.S. to move our attention and resources upstream, meaning to efforts that will promote healthy individuals, families and communities so that they can avoid preventable, costly health problems. One of the leading organizations behind this movement is the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) through an initiative called Culture of Health. The focus is on what works to build healthier communities.

But where does one start in trying to build healthier communities for the individuals and families who live and work there?

One place to start is understanding whether your community is healthy or not. Some years ago, David Kindig initiated a project at the University of Wisconsin called County Health Rankings and Roadmaps that provides county-level data on key health indicators and ranks counties in a state based upon a composite score. You can go to the website and look up your county and see what the major health problems are and which of these are contributing to a poorer state of health in your community. The website also provides background on the indicators, resources that speak to addressing specific health issues, and examples of successful local initiatives that communities have launched to address key health problems. The Action Model shown above provides a guide for communities to think about doing the work of building a healthier place to live, work and play. In addition, the RWJF has funded the University of Wisconsin to help counties to interpret their data and be coached in developing initiatives that can prevent leading health problems.

On September 27, I interviewed Jerry Spegman, a Community Coach at the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps initiative at the University of Wisconsin, on my radio program, HealthCetera in the Catskills, to talk about the health indicators for Delaware County. HealthCetera in the Catskills airs on WIOX Radio in Roxbury, NY, located in Delaware County. Our discussion could be used to spur conversations about how to improve health in your own community.


Image source: County Health Rankings Action Model

Since WWII, Americans have been sold the idea