Connect with Healthcetera
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 81)

 

We know that most older adults want to age in their own homes and communities, but the environment, health disparities, and lack of home and community supports can make that impossible. More public pressure and outreach can help change the situation.

 

credit: Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

I was pleased to attend a recent panel at the Association of Health Care Journalists conference which addressed this important issue. One speaker, Sarah L. Szanton, Ph.D., ANP, FAAN, a professor at Johns Hopkins School of Nursing in Baltimore, discussed a vital community based research study, called, CAPABLE, which helps seniors stay safer, and remain in their homes longer.

 

CAPABLE — or Community Aging in Place – Advancing Better Living for Elders, combines handyman services with nursing and occupational therapy. The program helps to improve mobility, reduce disability, and lower healthcare costs, according to Szanton, who developed the initiative. The results will help to determine if certain services can help older adults maintain their independence longer.

 

“The highest health care spending happens not when people have several chronic conditions, but when they have functional limitations, she said. “It’s completely unaddressed in current health care system.”

 

CAPABLE targets individual goals in self care – activities of daily living (ADLs) like bathing and dressing, and independent activities of daily living (IADLs) like cooking, cleaning or food shopping, she explained. It is client-directed, not client-centered, so that goals of the individual are addressed.

 

An older person may want something straightforward, like the ability to bathe alone. That can be addressed by installing grab bars in the shower. The capacity to cook for one’s self may mean the difference between staying independent at home or being forced to move into a faciltiy. Relatively simple fixes, like adjusting shelves, lowering cupboards or purchasing a microwave are simple, low-cost solutions that go a long way. Improving a person’s confidence while reducing their risk of falls when navigating stairs, can be taken care of by installing handrails on both sides of the staircase. It could determine whether an older person sleeps in their upstairs bedroom or on the living room couch.

 

CAPABLE clients received six occupational therapy and four RN visits over four months. Szanton said the program has shown “remarkable success,” for less than $3,000, per client. This includes a $1,300 handyman budget. In a randomized clinical trial and as a CMS demonstration project, CAPABLE “significantly reduced” the number of ADL issues over a five- month period among the study population, whose average age was 71.

 

Additionally, she said, depression among participants improved without medication. And, over the course of two years, the program saved Medicare about $10,000 per patient in preventive health costs, like fewer falls.

 

Preliminary results were published in the Journal of the American Geriatics Society in 2015. More recently, Szanton co-authored a policy-centered discussion about the importance of home and community based interventions in Health Affairs.

 

I asked Szanton what was perhaps an unanswerable question: while the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services promotes lowering costs, reducing hospital admissions and encourages aging in place, why doesn’t Medicare actually pay for some of these simple ideas that could save thousands of dollars per person over the long term? Apart from supporting small demonstration programs like this, how serious is the government about addressing the needs of the fast-growing older population, who only want to live out their lives in their own homes?

 

By educating journalists at panels like this one, Szanton is optimistic that the public will pressure policymakers to stop talking about what a good idea aging in place is, and start doing more to actually make it happen.

 

 

 

  We know that most older adults want

Source: kidneybuzz.com

Over 100,000 people are diagnosed each year with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and almost half a million people are living with it. The  progressive nature of the disease often eventually requires patients to go on kidney dialysis to survive, but the quality of life often deteriorates as patients spend multiple hours on each of several days every week hooked up to the dialysis machine. Despite this challenging course, only 10% of  patients with ESRD report having an end-of-life conversation with their nephrologist. The Coalition for Supportive Care of Kidney Patients is seeking to change this picture by having people with ESRD be fulling informed of their end-of-life options throughout the progression of the disease.

 

On April 20, 2017, HealthCetera Radio producer Diana Mason, PhD, RN, interviews two health professionals who are working with the Coalition on this aim through an initiative called My Way: Dale Lupu, MPH, PhD, Associate Research Professor with the Center for Aging, Health and Humanities at the George Washington University School of Nursing and Senior Adviser to the Coalition; and Liz Anderson, DSW, Assistant Professor of Social Work at Western Carolina University and Consultant/Palliative Care Expert for the Coalition. They discuss ESRD, advance directives, and a new brochure that’s available to help people with ESRD to make their end-of-life wishes known.

So tune in on Thursday, April 17th at 1:00 PM to WBAI, 99.5 FM in NYC or streaming at www.wbai.org. Or you can listen anytime by clicking here:

 

[caption id="attachment_12371" align="aligncenter" width="750"] Source: kidneybuzz.com[/caption] Over 100,000

If you had to rate your level of knowledge on a scale of 1-10, how high would you score if 10 indicated extremely knowledgeable? Now, think about all there is to know in the world and again, rate how knowledgeable you are. Did your score change? If it did, don’t worry, you are not alone.

Many people think they know a lot more than they do and offer strong opinions on matters they know relatively little about. Consider how discussions supporting or opposing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could result in adrenaline-raising debates. A brief pause to discuss the details of the ACA and implications of a repeal could silence the conversation or cause greater confusion. In healthcare, a lack of awareness regarding the limitations of one’s knowledge could prove disastrous. So why do individuals tend to overinflate their level of knowledge?

Steven Sloman and Philip Fernbach are cognitive scientists who explain why in their just released, soon to be best seller, Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone. The authors state that individuals tend to argue issues based on values and attitudes rather than a deep understanding of details and implications. In addition, information is just so readily accessible it is easy to exaggerate what one knows. The delineation between one’s own knowledge and that which is borrowed is sometimes blurred. Besides the embarrassment of opining on matters that reveal one’s true explanatory depth, the inherent dangers of the “knowledge illusion” could range from damaged relationships and stalled polices to medical errors and plane crashes. So how can a better understanding of the “knowledge illusion” improve safety, lead to less polarizing debates, and spark a more informed discourse?

Steve, a professor at Brown University and the Editor in Chief of the journal Cognition and Phil, a professor at the University of Colorado, will join me on HealthCetera to respond to the above questions and discuss the importance of collective wisdom. Be sure to tune in to HealthCetera on Thursday, April 20th at 1:00 on WBAI, 99.5 in New York City or go to www.wbai.org to stream live. Or, you can listen anytime by clicking here:

 

If you had to rate your level